Typical?? take a look at ur self getting all defensive about ur 360 when I didn't even say anything bad against it....now thats typical.

The 4 disc was on the article so I was shocked by the ammount but thx for clearing that it's only 2 disc.

Check my profile, I own both console.....

And read the rest of the thread referring 2 diss and not 4....

what on earth is rage?

^^

Here you go:

http://www.aftertheimpact.com/

Yep

umh I saw the vid for this ages ago and completely forgot about it ^^.

looks great though.

(PC for me... 360 is gonna be a bit old when this comes out).

My best friend pointed out something that I think has been missed. Carmack prefers OpenGL. He doesn't use Direct X. If anything, you'd think he would have an easier time getting an engine running well on PS3. I'm sure the gap will close by the time the game is released.

The architectural flaws of the PS3 continue to be a hindrance. If Sony was so hell bent on going with a drastically different architecture, they should have put enough effort into the developments tools for the developers to take advantage of it. Carmack isn't Terminal Reality, if he is having problems it's a hardware issue not a developer issue.

Obviously almost noone noticed the second half of what Carmack said:

"He is, however, confident that the PS3 version will match that of all other supported platforms: “Everything is designed as a 60 hertz game. We expect this to be 60 hertz on every supported platform.”

“The work remaining is getting it locked so there’s never a dropped frame or a tear, but we’re confident that we’re going to get that.”"

http://www.edge-online.com/news/carmack-ps3-performance-lags-behind-360

So, we'll have to see what the game will look like when it's done, not what it looks like in it's current development state.

Hmm..Very unusual thing.Well 2 bad but Id has lost it what it used to be.

i think all the ps3 problems & limitation come from the GPU. they cant change it or at least improve it ??