By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Prince of Persia

Eh...when people said this game was for trophy and achievement whores...they weren't kidding...I've only been playing about 20mins and already I have 10 trophies...? I was offered the game for £10 and apart from PSN games I had nothing else going so I figured why not but now I'm a little embarassed by the amount of trophies being thrown at me.

The actual game itself is very pretty, even on my crappy SDTV it looks good but the controls seems to require some getting used to, I've died roughly the same amount of times I've earned trophies but still...is it really meant to be this easy (trophywise)?



PS One/2/p/3slim/Vita owner. I survived the Apocalyps3/Collaps3 and all I got was this lousy signature.


Xbox One: What are you doing Dave?

Around the Network

The game bored me. Like Assassins Creed it could have been amazing if it wasn't so repetative. Seems to be a trend with Ubisoft.

Fight the same 5 bosses 5 times each? k.



Steroid said:
The game bored me. Like Assassins Creed it could have been amazing if it wasn't so repetative. Seems to be a trend with Ubisoft.

Fight the same 5 bosses 5 times each? k.


This.

 

Though it had pretty graphics...

 

OT:

Yeah, I didn't bother getting the combo-trophy, but got all the else.



                                        

yay...another...trophy....:( I'm starting to hate them now...never thought I'd say that :(



PS One/2/p/3slim/Vita owner. I survived the Apocalyps3/Collaps3 and all I got was this lousy signature.


Xbox One: What are you doing Dave?

Prince of Persia was dissapointing i didn't like the open world.



 

   PROUD MEMBER OF THE PLAYSTATION 3 : RPG FAN CLUB

 

Around the Network

Im going through it but can't be bothered to play more than one boss as its so boring.



How does it compare to the Sands of Time trilogy? Despite the mediocre fighting and the story direction they took in WW I fucking loved that series.

Offtopic: Man, what fuck is up with Ubisoft this gen? They went from being my favorite up and coming developer to one of my most dissapointing ones.



Akvod said:
How does it compare to the Sands of Time trilogy? Despite the mediocre fighting and the story direction they took in WW I fucking loved that series.

Offtopic: Man, what fuck is up with Ubisoft this gen? They went from being my favorite up and coming developer to one of my most dissapointing ones.


For my taste Ubisoft has been great so far in this gen. I love history and I love open world, so therefore I love both Far Cry 2 and Assassin's Creed (despite the same flaw in both, they get repetitive). Brothers in Arms: HH was weak, but I like the ambition they seem to have had.

Their games are beautiful, epic and cinematic, story-centered, atmospheric.

Why are you disappointed and what did you expect from Ubisoft in particular in this gen?



wow....this game gets really hard...u will see

and this is the best adventure game i have ever played so far

i just came from playing it btw...very much addictive



Yes like others said its just like Assassins Creed in ..... pretty ... lovely ... cell shaded graphics..... AH! no not going to give them thumbs up for graphics over gameplay!