BladeOfGod said:
|
This could really go back and forth into a 100 reply thread that no one gets anything out of, so let me just get this out of the way:
I myself am a Nintendo fan. If you have ever seen my posts around here, you may have noticed that. Personally, I do not crawl into threads where I have no interest. That is why I am not in the Prototype vs inFamous thread, or the lets hype up Mass Effect 2 thread.
The question is, why do PS3/360 console owners find the need to go into a thread concerning a system they do not own, for a game they are surely not interested in, and criticize a game they will not play, along with the system it is on? Why in Wii game reviews, do people have to mention
- "for a Wii game"
- "on other consoles"
- "No mini-game collection"
How come when the Wii falters in sales for two months in Japan, "the bubble will burst" and Wii sales will plummet everywhere? If that was the case, my 360 would be one of 10 left in America.
Most recently, I only see Wii sales mentioned when a Wii game is not included with PS360 multiplatform games, a la Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2. I have never seen someone say, this game sold more, so it is better. If that is the case, ET on the Atari was 5x better than Killzone 2.
Anyone stating HD sales arehorrible compared to Wii is just playing Captain Obvious; we have known this as fact for over 2 years now. And the Wii library is ridiculously good now, with every genre covered, and so many good games to play that even the most ardent gamer cannot afford to buy them all. I sure as death know I can't.
Leatherhat on July 6th, 2012 3pm. Vita sales:"3 mil for COD 2 mil for AC. Maybe more. " thehusbo on July 6th, 2012 5pm. Vita sales:"5 mil for COD 2.2 mil for AC."








