By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Gamepro reviews The Conduit, 3.5/5 wich is 70%

MaxwellGT2000 said:
3.5, it doesn't look as good as golden eye AND I didn't play the multiplayer, I'm perfectly in the right to review this game right guys?... guys? Why are you guys grabbing torches? NO NO PLEASE DON'T BURN ME!!!!

Anyone need a torch, I have a few spares



Around the Network

The problem here is that this review will affect The Conduits overall rating. All because of one bag of douche.



"Success really is decided at birth, and your life will never be better than it is right now. Sorry about that."

For comparison, they gave Dynasty Warriors 6 a 4/5 in the same issue.



Could I trouble you for some maple syrup to go with the plate of roffles you just served up?

Tag, courtesy of fkusumot: "Why do most of the PS3 fanboys have avatars that looks totally pissed?"
"Ok, girl's trapped in the elevator, and the power's off.  I swear, if a zombie comes around the next corner..."
NunedQ said:
mike_intellivision said:

Goldeneye 007 (N64) images from Gamespot.

Saying the game does not look better than Goldeneye on the N64 is just another proof that some reviewers (a) are poor at their jobs or (b) do not like the Wii.

you forgotto say mike from morgantown :P

It's an imposter!

We should burn him while we're out burning GamePro.



"The worst part about these reviews is they are [subjective]--and their scores often depend on how drunk you got the media at a Street Fighter event."  — Mona Hamilton, Capcom Senior VP of Marketing
*Image indefinitely borrowed from BrainBoxLtd without his consent.

hah, i didn't give that site hits. i just didn't bother.

How can such a display of blatant stupidity go unpunished?



Around the Network

I'm actually signing up to gamepro.com right now to comment on this "review". Seriously.



I stopped reading when he criticised the Wii's hardware. I mean, don't get me wrong, I'm not some blind fanboy thinking the machine can compete with 360 or PS3 in terms of processing power, but it just seems like a "HD gamer" dig at the Wii, and an excuse to criticise the game.

I've seen The Conduit in motion, and it is a massive step up from Goldeneye-by today's standards, Goldeneye is a blurry mess. Again, like I said, Conduit can't compete with PS3/360, but it is probably the most technically impressive Wii game (in my opinion the art style lets it down).

Anyway, even with the more positive IGN review I'm still not convinced The Conduit is for me. Also, I heard the controls are fully customisable? I would've thought that would satisfy most gamers. Guess this reviewer doesn't fit in to the "most gamers" category. =P



Darc Requiem said:
MaxwellGT2000 said:
3.5, it doesn't look as good as golden eye AND I didn't play the multiplayer, I'm perfectly in the right to review this game right guys?... guys? Why are you guys grabbing torches? NO NO PLEASE DON'T BURN ME!!!!

Anyone need a torch, I have a few spares

*takes a torch*

By the way, this review dropped The Conduits overall rating below a 80 on meta http://www.metacritic.com/games/platforms/wii/conduit



MaxwellGT2000 - "Does the amount of times you beat it count towards how hardcore you are?"

Wii Friend Code - 5882 9717 7391 0918 (PM me if you add me), PSN - MaxwellGT2000, XBL - BlkKniteCecil, MaxwellGT2000

Figlioni said:

The problem here is that this review will affect The Conduits overall rating. All because of one bag of douche.

The score isn't what bothers me, because 70% isn't a bad score, it is the lies that were splattered over that shit excuse for a review that did it for me. The guy doesn't deserve to be reviewing games, i'm surprised this twat even knows how to turn a console on.



How technical is your game?

lol @ wfz... dude, you're one of my favs!