bugrimmar said:
Dallinor said:
bugrimmar said: and to put boxing's power into perspective:
de la hoya's fight with mayweather brought in 120 million dollars worth of ppv buys. that's almost a year's worth of ufc ppvs. |
According to this source, the UFC actually topped $222 million in pay-per-view revenue in 2006, beating HBO Boxing, which took in $177 million.
The UFC is the fastest growing sport in America. It seems it's cutting into the WWE market share more then Boxing though.
And while it's true that the top boxers earn far more then the top UFC fighters (45 million for De Lay hoya vs 500k for Chuck Lidell) it seems the undercard fighters stand to earn more in the UFC.
|
that source is mmaweekly, which is heavily biased towards mma. that being said, i could find you numbers from a boxing website and flip the stack around. as i mentioned in that post you quoted, 1 boxing ppv (the de la hoya vs. mayweather fight) earned more than 10 ufc ppvs.
fact is, if the ufc was bigger than boxing, why do boxers earn 10x more? actually, ufc undercard fighters earn just as much as undercard boxers. most, even less. does this mean that the ufc is just shitting on it's fighters? i don't think so. the ufc just doesn't have the kind of budget to pay it's top stars 7 digit figures, while the top stars of boxing regularly earn at least 7 digits, and 8 digits for the elite.
look at the best mma fighter on this planet. Anderson Silva only earns around 150-200k per fight. pacquiao earns at least 10 million per fight. if the ufc had so many ppv buys, couldn't they afford to pay Anderson more than that? fact is, boxing can pay it's stars more because they get more money coming in. the ufc and mma are still in their growing stages.
i do agree though that one day, maybe next year or the year after that, mma will be bigger than any combat sport in the world. but right now, no. no way.
|
Those figures are all across the net.
For 2006, the UFC earned more revenue for PPV then HBO Boxing. I'm not saying UFC is bigger then boxing, take a look at your original post that I quoted. You stated that one [boxing] fight is almost worth a years UFC's PPV's. That honestly doesn't matter though, if there isnt a string of other fights bringing in revenue.
Boxing rakes in far more due to other forms of revenue then UFC, that's how they can afford to pay their fighters more.
So as far as overall revenue is concerned, Boxing is far more profitable. I was just dispelling the notion that UFC can't compete with Boxing in terms of PPV.
Fedor Emelianenko is the best MMA fighter on the planet. 