liquidninja said: All I know is that Old Super Mario Games are better than the new ones. |
I agree.
liquidninja said: All I know is that Old Super Mario Games are better than the new ones. |
I agree.
Pinab said:
Maybe because the OP actually was serious, and it is a serious question? It may not be ideally formed, and it may be a silly question, but it's still worth answering. Why are you replying with a facepalm? You're making someone who clearly made a (small) mistake feel even worse, for no real reason at all. |
If only the heavans had warned me of the damage a facepalm picture could do. Did you actually read the entire OP and take it so seriously? Guess so. Alright, i apologize for the facepalm picture if that makes those offended feel better. I actually had in mind maybe not following along with this joke, but it seems its far too late for that.
How technical is your game?
Ryudo said:
QFT |
errr. nope. Sega used to make tons of new stuff that wasn't just sonic/streets of rage/shinobi/etc. For all their systems they always created new and interesting franchises. And Sony is the same, look at their first/second party exclusives: Team Ico games are not the same stuff, Insmoniac created Resistance this generation, Naughty Dog created this new IP called "Uncharted", Sucker Punch went with a new IP called "Infamous", they have Heavy Rain, Motorstorm, Warhawk (new IP from Incognito, the creators of Twisted Metal). Level 5 created White Knight Chronicles insted of a new Dark Cloud. If you look around, you'll see Sony didn't prioritize sticking to the same old , same old.
TX109 said:
|
Man, that's the last time I try and help you out! If youre happy being in Zelda and Links shadow you go right on ahead. I just wanted you to have your own game.
I think if the the RTS was imbedded into the game it would be fine. Zelda has minigames all over it so what would be the harm in incorporating a RTS minigame that actually adds to the storyline? Fin. Fan. has done it and it hasn't wrecked the RPG.
I concede with you on the Metroid though I think that game should be called SAMUS.
I hate Metroids anyway. 3 clawed havin', jelly-fish looking, vampire wannabee's being!
The games may have smilier stories but what they differ is the level designs. Mario Sunshine and Mario Galexy. Zelda orcarina of time and wind waker. I don't know about metroid. Only played the fusio one for the GBA
Magnific0 said:
|
Kirby, Yoshi Island, Mario Kart, Mario World, Zelda, Metroid and others was not enough for you in the snes?
@edit: and You forgot that Nintendo has a lot of second party as well.
OMFG bro, did you just tell Nintendo to change Zelda?
Man, that's blasphemy. Every entry in that series has BLOWN me away.
Mess with a new IP, leave my Zelda alone, ffs.
I don't need your console war.
It feeds the rich while it buries the poor.
You're power hungry, spinnin' stories, and bein' graphics whores.
I don't need your console war.
NO NO, NO NO NO.
Hisiru said:
Mario don't has a story, is just a plataform game, what you think that is "story", is just what the characters represents (Mario= hero, Peach = Princess, Bowser= Villain). |
Exactly, Mario DO NOT have no story. The game is about being an amazingly fun platformer. Not about the epic transactions between Mario and Bowser. It's light hearted fun, with gameplay that is unsurpassed. A serious Mario game...would suck. The story would take away from the rest of the game.
I don't need your console war.
It feeds the rich while it buries the poor.
You're power hungry, spinnin' stories, and bein' graphics whores.
I don't need your console war.
NO NO, NO NO NO.
ZenfoldorVGI said:
Exactly, Mario DO NOT have no story. The game is about being an amazingly fun platformer. Not about the epic transactions between Mario and Bowser. It's light hearted fun, with gameplay that is unsurpassed. A serious Mario game...would suck. The story would take away from the rest of the game. |
You have my support, good sir.
Pixel Art can be fun.