Sony is a new company in this market if compared with Nintendo, and we already have God of war 3, Gran Turismo 5, etc, so you can include this company.

He's right.

I don't think he saying it to bash the company either.

People liked to be surprised and when every mario game has the same plot and ending, it's not very surprising.

So all Mario platformers play the same cause they have the same story? How does that make sense when they don't have any story (worth mentioning) at all? Mario games are about the gameplay, which has been genre defining for more than 20 years now.

There has been a lot of recycling in Zelda games, that's true, but there has been a lot of innovation too. Also, you can hardly call PH, MM or LA clones of previous Zelda games.

SM- Should go back to Mario 2 or 3 style.

LofZ- Should go MMORPG. Play as a Moblin, Zora help Link or
a game were you play as Gannon or a game where Zelda and Link have to command the armies of Hyrule with RTS flare for part of the game.

Metroid- Zero Suit Samus fighting in a Major Alien City with a GTA feel.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e9HN4zSriDs

All of those suggestions would destroy those franchises in a heart beat, except for maybe the super mario one.

Mario don't has a story, is just a plataform game, what you think that is "story", is just what the characters represents (Mario= hero, Peach = Princess, Bowser= Villain).

Maybe because the OP actually was serious, and it is a serious question? It may not be ideally formed, and it may be a silly question, but it's still worth answering.

Why are you replying with a facepalm? You're making someone who clearly made a (small) mistake feel even worse, for no real reason at all.

All I know is that Old Super Mario Games are better than the new ones.