| txrattlesnake said:
Well, the results of a poll that someone was published on this site not too long ago where they asked people if they thought they would be more likely to buy a PS4 if it was a graphical powerhouse that was the same leap in technology as the PS3 over the PS2 or if they would be more likely to buy a PS4 if it was just a slightly tweaked machine like the Wii, and the vast majority of people polled said they wanted a console that was another supersystem instead of just a slightly tweaked system. So, what do you do when more people want much better graphics, etc, yet development costs are too high?
|
Don't trust polls to predict people's behavior because what people say they will do and what they actually do are two very different things ...
Consider how many of the people who bought the Wii this generation would have said they were more likely to buy a PS3 if it was a major graphical improvement (like the PS2 was) than a system that was only a modest improvement in graphics and focused on motion controlls.
There are dozens of factors people don't take into consideration when creating these polls, for example would these people be willing to buy a PS4 that had a similar graphical improvement over the PS3 if it meant that the size of the console, its energy consumption, and the cost of the console/accessories/games also saw a similar increase to what the PS3 meant in comparison to the PS2? Is there really any demand for a $1000+ console with $70+ games and $70+ controllers, that is the size of a large tower PC and can act as a space-heater because of how much energy it uses?