Well, he looks better from a technical standpoint in KZ2, but overall, he's just a fugly guy.

To anyone that actually posted something on topic, thank you. To the rest of you; seriously you're like bickering children.

 I don't know why some people are getting so defensive. I bring up a legitimate point here. Killzone 2 is the sequel to a very average game, so says the general gaming population. The gent that made the point about Lair was dead on. Who in their right mind would have ever thought that Lair was going to be recieved that poorly? If you look up most previews on Uncharted also, you'll see a lot of skepticism by the press that has seen the in-game action and played it. There are aiming issues in the game and almost every article says that it needs to be ironed out. All I'm asking is if this game Killzone 2 deserves all the press it's getting, or is it all hype? Like some said, they're HOPING this is the "Halo Killer". I feel this game is recieving more attention than it deserves and I'm seriously skeptical about whether it will really deliver in the end. I'm also basing this on the fact that Sony as of recently has overhyped and underdelivered on a lot of major first party releases for the PS3. Motorstorm, Lair, and Heavenly Sword were nowhere in the critical range they were intended to be. Uncharted looks to be going in the same direction. The only two that delivered on the promise we're Warhawk and Resistance.

goooooooooooooo killzone2

I thought the facial animations overall looked pretty good, except for Rico's (the bald guy). Rico in general just look ugly as hell in KZ2. He looked much better in KZ1, but the graphics were horrible in comparison, so maybe we just couldn't see his ugliness back then. :P


==> the bald guy ?
the bald brown guy who is leading you in KZ2 beginning ?
because I think he should stop to use botox on his eyes !!!!

Firstly, what is your obsession with Rolf? Who is Rolf?

Secondly, you can make pictures making fun of MP8 if you want as long as they are funny and not offensive. I don't think anybody would actually care.

Thirdly, I think people have realised that Wii hardware isnt as powerful as PS3 hardware and that the games graphics arent as technically impressive.

I am (and I assume the rest of the community is too) quite happy for you to post flaws about the Wii and its games in the Nintendo forum as long as you do it appropriately, which knowing you you wouldnt. For example waltzing into a random thread about 'Wii reaches sales milestone' and saying 'Yeah but its graphics are teh shitz lolol' would not be acceptable. However waltzing into a thread saying 'Super Mario Galaxy looks as good as PS3 games' and making a reasoned and logical argument as to why its not true would be acceptable.

Oh and the reason people are scared of the idea of you being a mod is because you would be the worst mod ever. Srsly. I would rather have Gballzack or Blue3 as a mod than you. Your simply too defensive of the PS3, every time somebody criticised Sony I have the feeling they would end up with a ban.

@rath
ROFL

Rolling on floor laughing

Killzone 2 isnt about dull gray stuff to anyone that stated it, the first killzone had tree's but terrible graphics, I expect this one will have some light and forests, it would be stupid not to. It looks pretty fun to kill the helghask(better than killzone 1 the gun shots were annoying!!, kzLB for psp was great).

Killzoine is a big release??!??!? 

Am I missing something?!?

I never knew it was a big release.