theprof00 said: I just want to point out something very funny. Nintendo says it's peaked, and fanboys defend their own opinions. |
No, Nintendo did not. That was the authors assertion based on the new revenue, profit and unit sales projection. Show me in that article anything directly from Nintendo claiming they have peaked.
Since the numbers of sales aren't changing much the author pulls a very bad journalism tactic of inserting a conlusion or outcome based on irrelevant data. Point is just because this years figures aren't going to go up much doesn't mean 2010 won't - price cuts, new colors, bundles...hard to say. But it's an illogical conclusion. Prosecutors try to use the tactic a lot.
Here is an example of what I'm saying:
Assertion: Tom is a cat.
Assertion: Cats can see in the dark.
Conclusion: Tom can see in the dark.
Unless Tom is blind.
By leaving out that key piece of information - Tom being blind - you can state a logical fallacy to unwitting readers.
The rEVOLution is not being televised