Zizzla_Rachet said:
Akvod said: If I were them (assuming that they had no ultra secret game ready to be released 2009/early 2010) I would showcase multiplatform games like FF. Bolster that by teasing everyone with 2010-11 releases such as ME 2.
They have a big advantage going before Sony. If they could they should show off games like AC2.
They should also showcase games like (1 vs 100) and reinforce their online community aspect and claim that it's better than PSN. |
What would the price ratio of the PSN with DLC taxation..?
|
Could you rephrase that? Do you mean what would the price ratio of the PSN be with DLC taxation? How should I know? I never even brought it up...
I'm just trying to give my perspective into how I would spin something if I was a MS spokesperson, just like how Sony people do as well (Nintendo doesn't have time to respond with all the money counting they have to do [lol j/k, please don't ban me]).
All companies over exagerate everything to at least some extent. I think, given with the information we have now, it would be in the best interest of MS to bolster their exclusive lineups with multiplatform games like Assassin's Creed 2 or Final Fantasy XIII, and games coming out near the next E3 (sorta like Sony did last year with MAG, GOW, HR, etc. Although they had plenty to showcase as well with LBP, R2, etc) like ME2, Alan Wake, SC: Conviction (I'm really sad how Ubisoft killed such a great franchise =( ), etc.
They should definetly showcase, in HUGE letters, the 30 million bench mark, to sorta kill a bit of the excitement out of Sony's boast that they broke the 20 million mark.
I'm also guessing that they're trying to appeal to the casual gamer, and that if they do have anything with the avatars they should showcase it. They should also showcase the online games that will utilize avatars like 1 vs 100.
So it kinda looks like last year, except without the goliath of a lineup they had for the holidays with GeoW, Fable, etc.