By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft - E3 2009: Microsoft Promises Transformational Show

Akvod said:
If I were them (assuming that they had no ultra secret game ready to be released 2009/early 2010) I would showcase multiplatform games like FF. Bolster that by teasing everyone with 2010-11 releases such as ME 2.

They have a big advantage going before Sony. If they could they should show off games like AC2.

They should also showcase games like (1 vs 100) and reinforce their online community aspect and claim that it's better than PSN.

 

What would the price ratio of the PSN with DLC taxation..?



 



Around the Network

They will send out the signal to all 360s that will transform them into attack robots that will take over the world.



"transform", "home entertainment"....sounds to me like something in the same vein as the netflix announcement last year.



"will completely transform how people think about home entertainment"

hmm, im thinking he is talking about 1 Vs 1000 , right?

im curious too , hopefully they make a new IP not just claiming exclusive DLC.



badgenome said:
I bet Mattrick has invented something even more ambitious than avatars. Like motion control.

Wow... you think they will inovate THAT much?

But... that... that will just be a fad!



                            

Around the Network

well clearly any big blockbuster deal to show off to the public can only be in microsofts hands as they have most cash to spend.

so micro deffo will have a big E3



...not much time to post anymore, used to be awesome on here really good fond memories from VGchartz...

PSN: Skeeuk - XBL: SkeeUK - PC: Skeeuk

really miss the VGCHARTZ of 2008 - 2013...

Let the Hype Train begin!



 How our favorite systems are just like humans and sometimes have issues finding their special someone...

Xbox 360 wants to KinectPS3 wants to Move!  Why are both systems having such relationship problems?  The reason is they both become so infactuated with desire while watching the Wii as it waggles on by. They simply want what they can't have.

 Official member of the Xbox 360 Squad

M$ are goona own E3 this year. Some big stuff is coming people. :)



Zizzla_Rachet said:
Akvod said:
If I were them (assuming that they had no ultra secret game ready to be released 2009/early 2010) I would showcase multiplatform games like FF. Bolster that by teasing everyone with 2010-11 releases such as ME 2.

They have a big advantage going before Sony. If they could they should show off games like AC2.

They should also showcase games like (1 vs 100) and reinforce their online community aspect and claim that it's better than PSN.

 

What would the price ratio of the PSN with DLC taxation..?

Could you rephrase that? Do you mean what would the price ratio of the PSN be with DLC taxation? How should I know? I never even brought it up...

I'm just trying to give my perspective into how I would spin something if I was a MS spokesperson, just like how Sony people do as well (Nintendo doesn't have time to respond with all the money counting they have to do [lol j/k, please don't ban me]).

All companies over exagerate everything to at least some extent. I think, given with the information we have now, it would be in the best interest of MS to bolster their exclusive lineups with multiplatform games like Assassin's Creed 2 or Final Fantasy XIII, and games coming out near the next E3 (sorta like Sony did last year with MAG, GOW, HR, etc. Although they had plenty to showcase as well with LBP, R2, etc) like ME2, Alan Wake, SC: Conviction (I'm really sad how Ubisoft killed such a great franchise =( ), etc.

They should definetly showcase, in HUGE letters, the 30 million bench mark, to sorta kill a bit of the excitement out of Sony's boast that they broke the 20 million mark.

I'm also guessing that they're trying to appeal to the casual gamer, and that if they do have anything with the avatars they should showcase it. They should also showcase the online games that will utilize avatars like 1 vs 100.

So it kinda looks like last year, except without the goliath of a lineup they had for the holidays with GeoW, Fable, etc.



Akvod said:
Zizzla_Rachet said:
Akvod said:
If I were them (assuming that they had no ultra secret game ready to be released 2009/early 2010) I would showcase multiplatform games like FF. Bolster that by teasing everyone with 2010-11 releases such as ME 2.

They have a big advantage going before Sony. If they could they should show off games like AC2.

They should also showcase games like (1 vs 100) and reinforce their online community aspect and claim that it's better than PSN.

 

What would the price ratio of the PSN with DLC taxation..?

Could you rephrase that? Do you mean what would the price ratio of the PSN be with DLC taxation? How should I know? I never even brought it up...

I'm just trying to give my perspective into how I would spin something if I was a MS spokesperson, just like how Sony people do as well (Nintendo doesn't have time to respond with all the money counting they have to do [lol j/k, please don't ban me]).

All companies over exagerate everything to at least some extent. I think, given with the information we have now, it would be in the best interest of MS to bolster their exclusive lineups with multiplatform games like Assassin's Creed 2 or Final Fantasy XIII, and games coming out near the next E3 (sorta like Sony did last year with MAG, GOW, HR, etc. Although they had plenty to showcase as well with LBP, R2, etc) like ME2, Alan Wake, SC: Conviction (I'm really sad how Ubisoft killed such a great franchise =( ), etc.

They should definetly showcase, in HUGE letters, the 30 million bench mark, to sorta kill a bit of the excitement out of Sony's boast that they broke the 20 million mark.

I'm also guessing that they're trying to appeal to the casual gamer, and that if they do have anything with the avatars they should showcase it. They should also showcase the online games that will utilize avatars like 1 vs 100.

So it kinda looks like last year, except without the goliath of a lineup they had for the holidays with GeoW, Fable, etc.

from what I heard Sony charges tax on Downloads...and what I meant by ratio is that...If in a year you download enough content over the psn to rack up 40 or more dollars then the PSN is not free on a yearly basis.....On XBL you are not Taxed for DLC purchases....Can you confirm that Sony charges tax for DLC purchases?