Akvod said:
Could you rephrase that? Do you mean what would the price ratio of the PSN be with DLC taxation? How should I know? I never even brought it up... I'm just trying to give my perspective into how I would spin something if I was a MS spokesperson, just like how Sony people do as well (Nintendo doesn't have time to respond with all the money counting they have to do [lol j/k, please don't ban me]). All companies over exagerate everything to at least some extent. I think, given with the information we have now, it would be in the best interest of MS to bolster their exclusive lineups with multiplatform games like Assassin's Creed 2 or Final Fantasy XIII, and games coming out near the next E3 (sorta like Sony did last year with MAG, GOW, HR, etc. Although they had plenty to showcase as well with LBP, R2, etc) like ME2, Alan Wake, SC: Conviction (I'm really sad how Ubisoft killed such a great franchise =( ), etc. They should definetly showcase, in HUGE letters, the 30 million bench mark, to sorta kill a bit of the excitement out of Sony's boast that they broke the 20 million mark. I'm also guessing that they're trying to appeal to the casual gamer, and that if they do have anything with the avatars they should showcase it. They should also showcase the online games that will utilize avatars like 1 vs 100. So it kinda looks like last year, except without the goliath of a lineup they had for the holidays with GeoW, Fable, etc. |
from what I heard Sony charges tax on Downloads...and what I meant by ratio is that...If in a year you download enough content over the psn to rack up 40 or more dollars then the PSN is not free on a yearly basis.....On XBL you are not Taxed for DLC purchases....Can you confirm that Sony charges tax for DLC purchases?
