i see, but i heard the change of it going on Ps3 is Zero, well , to all who never played it , i dont think its a big lose, the game is way too glitchy and cliche characters and storyline.

@OP Sounds like you need to buy a 360

@Draven yes M$ is the Publisher.

Well....This came out of nowhere....Sorry Bud but you wont see Gears of War tittle on PS3....and as for all of KZ2 is greater than Gears and what not's....You might be right you might be wrong....But as it stands GoW2 and Gears 1 is part of the Xbox 360 exp. Jump In

 shhhh don't let Raz hear ya, he thinks it's the Holy Grail of gaming and can't possibly be done on the PS3, only if they downgrade it  haha. Cause PS3 has no exlusives that look better at all... 

@ Zizzla
i agree Killzone is not greater than gears, cause its not the same genre (and the fact i didnt play Killzone except the demo lol)
and also about the OP he didnt write it , he posted it from the source.

u can say saimcheeda!

I think you could probably do it on PS3 if they nixed the split-screen, like they did for Unreal Tournament 3, but nixing the split-screen is like taking the multiplayer out of Halo or CoD, or perks/vehicles....the game would cease to be fully-featured.

That's really the great thing about Halo, Gears and recently Call of Duty, they cater to every one, they all have split-screen deathmatch, they all have split-screen co-op (as well as online for both), so you know, even when the graphics are insane, you can always get a buddy and second controller and the game will look and run identically.

That's really a big problem with the PS3, split-screen is basically ignored because of development issues and sometimes worse, Killzone 2 for instance, bad enough it had no local multiplayer, but the fact that a game, 4 years in development, squad based first person shooter and it doesn't have online co-op? What the hell were they thinking?

Onto GoW, Resident Evil 5 came closests, graphically it's better, but technically it's inferior, plus they downgraded the PS3 version so...that's just further supportive of the technical sacrifices Epic would have to make.

It's hard to take efforts like MGS4 and uncharted 1 seriously when neither match the basic technical criteria of Gears of War 1, let alone Gears of War 2. Still it looks like uncharted 2 has multiplayer, so split-screen is a given, otherwise Naughty Dog would be acknowledging Resident Evil 5 and Gears 1/2 as technically superior games.

are your saying MGS4 should have offline multiplayer and co-op?

Don't see why not, there's no excuse for the pure MGO element not having split-screen mode, it is a simple deathmatch mode and other games with similar graphics and framerates pull it off very well.

While some might have a problem with split-screen co-op in singleplayer, they need merely only enable it after the single-player games has been completed, not that it needs to be canonical anyway either, there's certainly nothing canonical about 2 Master Chiefs.

wow, nice to see Raz on here. I got used to him bitching about the ps3 in Gamefaqs, nice to see he's consistant.

OT
Not gonna happen at least anytime soon.

I agree with you guys 1000% I honestly think that all the current exclusives need to stay exclusive and whatnot. As one of the biggest PS3 fanboys on this site I would NOT want Gears 3 going multiplat simply because that makes both consoles less unique. I would rather see EPIC create a multiplat new IP then making one of their exclusives multiplat.

It also doesnt hurt that when a title is exclusive the developers can concentrate on maxing out that consoles capabilities