Well at first I thought it was a great idea. VG Chartz is a fairly popular gaming website, so they deserve to rate games.
Well, obviously I was wrong. The ratings seem either biased, or just wrong.
Examples:
Endless Ocean - 8.3 > Fallout 3 - 8.2
Valkyrie Chronicles - 9.4 > Bioshock - 9.3
Tales of Vesperia - 8.8 = Halo 3 - 8.8
Civilization Revolution - 8.7 = Uncharted - 8.7
God of War: Chains of Olympus - 7.9?
So your saying Endless ocean, a diving sim, is better than Fallout 3 which has been arguably the best game of 2008 (by IGN).
Your saying Valkyrie Chronicles (which is a great game, don't get me wrong) is better than Bioshock, the 2007 GOTY by many sites.
Tales of Vesperia is as good as the 360's biggest game which is still being played a ton 2 years after release.
This one I don't even understand. A game nobody's heard of as good as the best graphical game on any console except maybe Killzone 2 or Gears of War 2.
And this one doesn't sit well with me. Chains of Olympus has a 91 on Metacritic based on 79 reviews. And out of those 79 reviews only 1 is less than 80 (Edge Magazine). Are you just trying to shake things up by giving the PSP's best game a horrible rating?
Well I've said all I have to say. Thanks for reading. Post what you think about VG ratings.