For a long time time now, all i have heard from some fans is that excuse that a game that fail to sell well at first or as I call it ( have boobs), will eventually have legs. 

But as a gamer and I believe most developers,  prefer games that start out with huge boobs ( large opening) and have legs at the same time. Yes, I do understand that the Wii and the DS are a different Beast, but there are plenty games that have had both boobs and legs such as wiifit and Mario Kart. 

And i question the profibility of a game that takes more that a year to get to a million, espacially with price drops and bargains. 

So, my fellow gamers, embrace the boobs and follow with the legs, buy the games in the beginning too.

Surely it's easier to have a large opening with legs than boobs.... I mean I can't say I have ever seen an opening near any boobs.

Classic British humor...

Let's look at The version on GTA on the DS, that game had no boobs, But in two years, i expect it to sell 2 million easy with legs. But, i doubt the developers are happier that way.

psrock... you win, epicly, in all forms of life

lmfao nice analogy

i have to agree man. i love games with *****

So u r telling me that developers are not happy with a game that sells *at least* 2 millions???

No, he's saying devs would rather a game sell more in the short term rather than over a long period of time.

It makes sense. Just ask yourself, what do you prefer? Big legs or big boobs?

Actually, publishers prefer legs. That makes it easier to forecast revenue and provides money during times of typically rough quarters.

Large boobs, as it were, only give them a good media nugget.