| Zkuq said: It was rather good but again, gameplay sucked. Well, in IV it sucked even more. No, I don't mean sucked in, just sucked. Was bad. |
What do you mean? The gameplay was the best gameplay from any game
No it isn't.
I can't think of one single aspect of San Andreas that is better than Chrono Trigger. Not one.
Quem disse que a boca é tua?
Qual é, Dadinho...?
Dadinho é o caralho! Meu nome agora é Zé Pequeno!
i still never finished the main story line... i gotta get it one of these days
| Johann said: No it isn't. I can't think of one single aspect of San Andreas that is better than Chrono Trigger. Not one. |
Voice acting 
| SHMUPGurus said: GTA IV was damn fine! Will you people please AT LEAST explain why GTA IV didn't live up to the hype? Is it because it was supposed to be a bigger game, and they had to make it fit on a DVD instead? San Andreas had funny stuff, like gangs, tattoos and bodybuilding, but they were useless extras in my opinion. The arcade driving controls feel so outdated after playing GTA IV, I can barely drive without hitting anything! o_O |
Fucking Niko can't drive for shit. At least in SA, you can upgrade driving skill.
For me, SA > GTA IV because of the RPG elements in the former.
I preferred Vice City. While I appreciated the attempting to write a well done character in SA. It was overall terrible. The hero goes from someone trying to stay out to homicidal maniac. Way to early too. I do get the concept of being drawn and losing your self, but there never seems to be a retrospective. Even when his sister is their wanting him and her boyfriend to be better.
At least in VC the guy is a maniac and they never really try to hide it either. It's a game where you can drown in that you are a dirt bag. I was able to enjoy that. Theres no pretense of a morally good person or to be a morally good person.
SA world design was probably better in regards to realism, size and scope, but it felt more empty compared to VC. VC was more stylized and had more presence as a world. Both were fun to drive around in. To me this is a tie. Bigger world vs Stronger world.
I like VC more, but given the opportunity of being a human I would have preferred SA. They just did a poor job.
If GTA4 comes to the PC I might enjoy that more than SA.
Squilliam: On Vgcharts its a commonly accepted practice to twist the bounds of plausibility in order to support your argument or agenda so I think its pretty cool that this gives me the precedent to say whatever I damn well please.
sabby_e17 said:
What do you mean? The gameplay was the best gameplay from any game |
To me, gameplay includes controls as well. It was far from perfect. Then again, San Andreas is probably the only GTA I've ever gotten into so its gameplay is definitely the best of the series, although it's still not good.
| sabby_e17 said: Most people will have to agree with me. Gta SA was so good. The amount of things u could do was endless. After Vice City I thought that there was'nt much to add to the next GTA but Rockstar did it. Too bad GTA 4 isnt that great. It has nothing on GTA SA. Its so good that Ive still been playing it, more than 4 years after release. But for some stupid reason my disc has stopped working and now im depressed... GTA 4 was supposed to be the biggest game for me this gen however ive dumped it and moved onto Killzone 2.
|
I am not surprised you considered that to be the best game of all time because you hate books.
How many cups of darkness have I drank over the years? Even I don't know...
Godot said:
I am not surprised you considered that to be the best game of all time because you hate books. |
Umm then why do I like pokemon mystery dungeon, MGS, Bioshock and so many other good games with great stories? I just hate reading because it gets very boring.
| .jayderyu said: If GTA4 comes to the PC I might enjoy that more than SA. |
??????????????????
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2026 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
