it's good enough quality for what it's being used for, lower quality pictures on a tiny screen to just play around with.

so, there nothing wrong with it i think. i don't need some 3.0 megapixel camera in my ds.

Some extent!?

Okie as promised ,i return with some more outdoor pics. :)

And as you can see some pics that ramuji posted ,DSi also have and options to play with pictures you take. :)

Ooh, those outdoor pix look great. Way better than I expected. I already have a really nice LEICA camera, but this will be great for the Mario 64-style and Mario Paint-style editing I can do with it. And the inevitable DSWare games that use the camera.

You have too much money.

Is the outside camera really 0.3MP? Thought it was more.
Not bad, but it's like my old cellphone, sufficient for games.

not as bad as I was expecting when I originaly heard .2 megapixels. But of course if I saw something cool I would still reach for my 35mm slr

Are those really 0.3 MP?

I have a really old phone with 0.6MP and it looks absolutely horrid even on the phone size screen.

Are we sure it's 0.3MP? and are both of them the same because ramuji's face pictures look even clearer.

----

That said it's obviously not professional quality, but if it is really 0.3MP it's impressive.

I have a really hard beliving that those are taken with a 0.3mp camera. Then again, who knows.

very good considering it's a .3 megapixel camera. The third picture does concern me a little though ^_^