Well you got me there on the "odds" thing. Men tend to think with "logic" and I'm no exception. However, by your definition of "love", you shouldn't have to "make it work", it should work automatically. It's starting to sound like the compromise I spoke of before not the "perfect" relationship.
You're putting words in my mouth... I never said relashionships were ment to be perfect. There's no such thing as perfection.
Oh and women too can work with logic... But we don't tend to use it with relationships as they're not logical, but emotional. ;)
That is where the ultimate clash of the genders arise and also why you think your relationship would work irregardless of the evidence against. You too emotionally involved but once those emotions die down, I wish I could get some feedback then...I really do wish the best for you and your boyfriend. I just think statistically. I guess it's because this biostatistics course I'm taking right now is so annoying lol.
You've taken 1 step forward by admitting that relationships aren't "perfect". You'll be rid of the "fairytales" soon enough
I think you need to stop acting like an elitist. She assume so much and you've spinned almost everything she has said.
And you know, she cleverly evaded answering to all the points I made. You people need to stop defending "the girl". Funny enough, I'm the one who ends up been a "sexist" and an "elitist" yet those of you who defend her only because she is "female" don't get called out. very funny indeed. do you guys even know what the terms "sexist" and "elitist" mean?
Yes I think elevating yourself above lolita and arrogantly telling her your wrong and what you think isn't right. That's elitist.
And I'm defending her because we share the same views. I think women are much better than used for sex.
And I:
lolz aside, I still think your are very rudely throwing any ideals aside that are not in line with yours.
"We'll toss the dice however they fall, And snuggle the girls be they short or tall, Then follow young Mat whenever he calls, To dance with Jak o' the Shadows."
Well you got me there on the "odds" thing. Men tend to think with "logic" and I'm no exception. However, by your definition of "love", you shouldn't have to "make it work", it should work automatically. It's starting to sound like the compromise I spoke of before not the "perfect" relationship.
You're putting words in my mouth... I never said relashionships were ment to be perfect. There's no such thing as perfection.
Oh and women too can work with logic... But we don't tend to use it with relationships as they're not logical, but emotional. ;)
That is where the ultimate clash of the genders arise and also why you think your relationship would work irregardless of the evidence against. You too emotionally involved but once those emotions die down, I wish I could get some feedback then...I really do wish the best for you and your boyfriend. I just think statistically. I guess it's because this biostatistics course I'm taking right now is so annoying lol.
You've taken 1 step forward by admitting that relationships aren't "perfect". You'll be rid of the "fairytales" soon enough
I think you need to stop acting like an elitist. She assume so much and you've spinned almost everything she has said.
And you know, she cleverly evaded answering to all the points I made. You people need to stop defending "the girl". Funny enough, I'm the one who ends up been a "sexist" and an "elitist" yet those of you who defend her only because she is "female" don't get called out. very funny indeed. do you guys even know what the terms "sexist" and "elitist" mean?
Yes I think elevating yourself above lolita and arrogantly telling her your wrong and what you think isn't right. That's elitist.
And I'm defending her because we share the same views. I think women are much better than used for sex.
And I:
lolz aside, I still think your are very rudely throwing any ideals aside that are not in line with yours.
So explain to me how I elevated myself above her? I debated my points fair and square and she couldn't argue hers through, thats what happened. Frankly, I'm not too sure you know what "elitist" means. people have called me a "pig" and insinuated all kinds of things about me on this thread because they didn't like my ideals, you should call them elitist too.
Other dudes made points on a similar line as her but you only chose to defend her. it's because she's a girl. I'm not stupid and I think you're the one who's "sexist" not me. Women don't need men to speak for them, we were all born with mouths.
I said keyword I (that is :me) find "women" only useful to ME for sex. I did not speak for everyone else. I also went further to define what the difference between women who considered themselves just "women" versus those who call themselves "soldier" or 'doctor" or "professor", etc. There's a difference man. If a girl came and said the same thing about men, I can assure you that I couldn't care less. Read through my points before making unnecessary judgements.
"Dr. Tenma, according to you, lives are equal. That's why I live today. But you must have realised it by now...the only thing people are equal in is death"---Johann Liebert (MONSTER)
"WAR is a racket. It always has been.
It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives"---Maj. Gen. Smedley Butler
Well you got me there on the "odds" thing. Men tend to think with "logic" and I'm no exception. However, by your definition of "love", you shouldn't have to "make it work", it should work automatically. It's starting to sound like the compromise I spoke of before not the "perfect" relationship.
You're putting words in my mouth... I never said relashionships were ment to be perfect. There's no such thing as perfection.
Oh and women too can work with logic... But we don't tend to use it with relationships as they're not logical, but emotional. ;)
That is where the ultimate clash of the genders arise and also why you think your relationship would work irregardless of the evidence against. You too emotionally involved but once those emotions die down, I wish I could get some feedback then...I really do wish the best for you and your boyfriend. I just think statistically. I guess it's because this biostatistics course I'm taking right now is so annoying lol.
You've taken 1 step forward by admitting that relationships aren't "perfect". You'll be rid of the "fairytales" soon enough
I think you need to stop acting like an elitist. She assume so much and you've spinned almost everything she has said.
And you know, she cleverly evaded answering to all the points I made. You people need to stop defending "the girl". Funny enough, I'm the one who ends up been a "sexist" and an "elitist" yet those of you who defend her only because she is "female" don't get called out. very funny indeed. do you guys even know what the terms "sexist" and "elitist" mean?
Yes I think elevating yourself above lolita and arrogantly telling her your wrong and what you think isn't right. That's elitist.
And I'm defending her because we share the same views. I think women are much better than used for sex.
And I:
lolz aside, I still think your are very rudely throwing any ideals aside that are not in line with yours.
So explain to me how I elevated myself above her? I debated my points fair and square and she couldn't argue hers through, thats what happened. Frankly, I'm not too sure you know what "elitist" means. people have called me a "pig" and insinuated all kinds of things about me on this thread because they didn't like my ideals, you should call them elitist too.
Other dudes made points on a similar line as her but you only chose to defend her. it's because she's a girl. I'm not stupid and I think you're the one who's "sexist" not me. Women don't need men to speak for them, we were all born with mouths.
I said keyword I (that is :me) find "women" only useful to ME for sex. I did not speak for everyone else. I also went further to define what the difference between women who considered themselves just "women" versus those who call themselves "soldier" or 'doctor" or "professor", etc. There's a difference man. If a girl came and said the same thing about men, I can assure you that I couldn't care less. Read through my points before making unnecessary judgements.
I never said you were sexist, and you clearly didn't read my post because I said I wasn't defending her because she was a girl. I am because I share similar beliefs. I didn't call you a pig either. Where I live, it's quite normal to be politically incorrect, so I think you are entitled to that belief but don't belittle hers.
And you elevated yourself above her when you called her thoughts of love 'fairytales', insisting that it can not possibly be true. Just because.
"We'll toss the dice however they fall, And snuggle the girls be they short or tall, Then follow young Mat whenever he calls, To dance with Jak o' the Shadows."
Well you got me there on the "odds" thing. Men tend to think with "logic" and I'm no exception. However, by your definition of "love", you shouldn't have to "make it work", it should work automatically. It's starting to sound like the compromise I spoke of before not the "perfect" relationship.
You're putting words in my mouth... I never said relashionships were ment to be perfect. There's no such thing as perfection.
Oh and women too can work with logic... But we don't tend to use it with relationships as they're not logical, but emotional. ;)
That is where the ultimate clash of the genders arise and also why you think your relationship would work irregardless of the evidence against. You too emotionally involved but once those emotions die down, I wish I could get some feedback then...I really do wish the best for you and your boyfriend. I just think statistically. I guess it's because this biostatistics course I'm taking right now is so annoying lol.
You've taken 1 step forward by admitting that relationships aren't "perfect". You'll be rid of the "fairytales" soon enough
I think you need to stop acting like an elitist. She assume so much and you've spinned almost everything she has said.
And you know, she cleverly evaded answering to all the points I made. You people need to stop defending "the girl". Funny enough, I'm the one who ends up been a "sexist" and an "elitist" yet those of you who defend her only because she is "female" don't get called out. very funny indeed. do you guys even know what the terms "sexist" and "elitist" mean?
Yes I think elevating yourself above lolita and arrogantly telling her your wrong and what you think isn't right. That's elitist.
And I'm defending her because we share the same views. I think women are much better than used for sex.
And I:
lolz aside, I still think your are very rudely throwing any ideals aside that are not in line with yours.
So explain to me how I elevated myself above her? I debated my points fair and square and she couldn't argue hers through, thats what happened. Frankly, I'm not too sure you know what "elitist" means. people have called me a "pig" and insinuated all kinds of things about me on this thread because they didn't like my ideals, you should call them elitist too.
Other dudes made points on a similar line as her but you only chose to defend her. it's because she's a girl. I'm not stupid and I think you're the one who's "sexist" not me. Women don't need men to speak for them, we were all born with mouths.
I said keyword I (that is :me) find "women" only useful to ME for sex. I did not speak for everyone else. I also went further to define what the difference between women who considered themselves just "women" versus those who call themselves "soldier" or 'doctor" or "professor", etc. There's a difference man. If a girl came and said the same thing about men, I can assure you that I couldn't care less. Read through my points before making unnecessary judgements.
I never said you were sexist, and you clearly didn't read my post because I said I wasn't defending her because she was a girl. I am because I share similar beliefs. I didn't call you a pig either. Where I live, it's quite normal to be politically incorrect, so I think you are entitled to that belief but don't belittle hers.
And you elevated yourself above her when you called her thoughts of love 'fairytales', insisting that it can not possibly be true. Just because.
I said she could be the "exception" but statistics speak otherwise. I went further to say I don't know her so I can't really say. This doesn't equate to saying that it is not possiblty true. I said her thoughts arose from "fairytales", I agree with that one but she started off by calling me an asshole. Still I don't think this means I elevated myself above her when even she suggested the same and I said she was wrong.
"Dr. Tenma, according to you, lives are equal. That's why I live today. But you must have realised it by now...the only thing people are equal in is death"---Johann Liebert (MONSTER)
"WAR is a racket. It always has been.
It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives"---Maj. Gen. Smedley Butler
dammit...a single female user added the almost the whole of the vgcz community within a month and a half...how can i forget.....vgcz members = none gamers ???????
Pristine20, how do you explain the fact that some of us have parents, grandparents, extended family, etc. that have had meaningful relationships for decades?
I wouldn't call having a successful relationship an exception to the rule. All it takes is a bit of maturity and selflessness.
