outlawauron said:
Yes I think elevating yourself above lolita and arrogantly telling her your wrong and what you think isn't right. That's elitist. And I'm defending her because we share the same views. I think women are much better than used for sex. And I:
lolz aside, I still think your are very rudely throwing any ideals aside that are not in line with yours.
|
So explain to me how I elevated myself above her? I debated my points fair and square and she couldn't argue hers through, thats what happened. Frankly, I'm not too sure you know what "elitist" means. people have called me a "pig" and insinuated all kinds of things about me on this thread because they didn't like my ideals, you should call them elitist too.
Other dudes made points on a similar line as her but you only chose to defend her. it's because she's a girl. I'm not stupid and I think you're the one who's "sexist" not me. Women don't need men to speak for them, we were all born with mouths.
I said keyword I (that is :me) find "women" only useful to ME for sex. I did not speak for everyone else. I also went further to define what the difference between women who considered themselves just "women" versus those who call themselves "soldier" or 'doctor" or "professor", etc. There's a difference man. If a girl came and said the same thing about men, I can assure you that I couldn't care less. Read through my points before making unnecessary judgements.
"Dr. Tenma, according to you, lives are equal. That's why I live today. But you must have realised it by now...the only thing people are equal in is death"---Johann Liebert (MONSTER)
"WAR is a racket. It always has been.
It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives"---Maj. Gen. Smedley Butler







