Well you got me there on the "odds" thing. Men tend to think with "logic" and I'm no exception. However, by your definition of "love", you shouldn't have to "make it work", it should work automatically. It's starting to sound like the compromise I spoke of before not the "perfect" relationship.
You're putting words in my mouth... I never said relashionships were ment to be perfect. There's no such thing as perfection.
Oh and women too can work with logic... But we don't tend to use it with relationships as they're not logical, but emotional. ;)
That is where the ultimate clash of the genders arise and also why you think your relationship would work irregardless of the evidence against. You too emotionally involved but once those emotions die down, I wish I could get some feedback then...I really do wish the best for you and your boyfriend. I just think statistically. I guess it's because this biostatistics course I'm taking right now is so annoying lol.
You've taken 1 step forward by admitting that relationships aren't "perfect". You'll be rid of the "fairytales" soon enough
I think you need to stop acting like an elitist. She assume so much and you've spinned almost everything she has said.
And you know, she cleverly evaded answering to all the points I made. You people need to stop defending "the girl". Funny enough, I'm the one who ends up been a "sexist" and an "elitist" yet those of you who defend her only because she is "female" don't get called out. very funny indeed. do you guys even know what the terms "sexist" and "elitist" mean?
Yes I think elevating yourself above lolita and arrogantly telling her your wrong and what you think isn't right. That's elitist.
And I'm defending her because we share the same views. I think women are much better than used for sex.
And I:
lolz aside, I still think your are very rudely throwing any ideals aside that are not in line with yours.
So explain to me how I elevated myself above her? I debated my points fair and square and she couldn't argue hers through, thats what happened. Frankly, I'm not too sure you know what "elitist" means. people have called me a "pig" and insinuated all kinds of things about me on this thread because they didn't like my ideals, you should call them elitist too.
Other dudes made points on a similar line as her but you only chose to defend her. it's because she's a girl. I'm not stupid and I think you're the one who's "sexist" not me. Women don't need men to speak for them, we were all born with mouths.
I said keyword I (that is :me) find "women" only useful to ME for sex. I did not speak for everyone else. I also went further to define what the difference between women who considered themselves just "women" versus those who call themselves "soldier" or 'doctor" or "professor", etc. There's a difference man. If a girl came and said the same thing about men, I can assure you that I couldn't care less. Read through my points before making unnecessary judgements.
I never said you were sexist, and you clearly didn't read my post because I said I wasn't defending her because she was a girl. I am because I share similar beliefs. I didn't call you a pig either. Where I live, it's quite normal to be politically incorrect, so I think you are entitled to that belief but don't belittle hers.
And you elevated yourself above her when you called her thoughts of love 'fairytales', insisting that it can not possibly be true. Just because.
"We'll toss the dice however they fall, And snuggle the girls be they short or tall, Then follow young Mat whenever he calls, To dance with Jak o' the Shadows."
