Akuma come on. I know you were hoping that "trend" was going to lead more towards your side as opposed to sitting near the middle. Let me ask you though how many of the winners in the last five years swing my way? 3 of the past five Best Pictures have been won by films that have not led in nominations. Another was a tie and only once, five years ago has a movie with the most nominations won. You don't see a bit of a shift here? That's ok though. I'm going to look up how many former Best Pictures in the last 10 years got completely snubbed by the Globes and BAFTAs and I'll get back to you. Usually they're where Best Pictures build momentum, not lose it.
Edit: Yup, no film in the last 10 years that has won Best Picture has won nothing between the BAFTAS and the Globes. Can Benjamin Button break that trend? Sure. But I'm not the only one that understands that losing out completely at both isn't good for Academy momentum, and it's understood at the moment that despite having more noms, Slumdog Millionaire is the favorite to win. Also your trend of frontrunners is working more in my favor than yours. Being the front runner hasn't meant much of anything these last few years.
Double Edit: The only two Best Picture nominees that ended up winning but weren't the front runners(predicted by editors) going in were Crash and Shakespeare in Love. All 8 other years, the expected winners came up on top.










