| colonelstubbs said: All this thread has done has made me want to buy bioshock for my 360 |
You mean you didn't buy it yet!?!

| colonelstubbs said: All this thread has done has made me want to buy bioshock for my 360 |
You mean you didn't buy it yet!?!

| ameratsu said:
No, it's not. Myself and others refuted this claim in the IGN goty thread but you seem to want to hold on to your misleading claim. A gem that nobody plays is still a gem. Playtime is not indicative of quality.
|
You could use the same logic for reviews. "A gem that nobody reviews is still a gem"
I'll take average play time over average review score any day.
frybread said:
You could use the same logic for reviews. "A gem that nobody reviews is still a gem" I'll take average play time over average review score any day.
|
lol nice stealth edit .
Skeeuk said:
these aggregated scores are stupid, i cnt belive some ppl judge a game according to metacritic. a good example is fable 2, it was 92 according to 52 reviews, then aggregated to 89 from 70+ reviews? does the game all of a sudden become less worthy at 70+ reviews aggregated compared to 52+ reviews aggregated. its just a joke |
Well in my opinion any game is worth playing with a score from 75-100. Anything less you must (should) be a fan of the genre to like it.
So personally it doesn't interest me at all if the game scores 89 or 90, but it helps with arguing against fanboys 
I tend to think that Wii will dominate the exclusives list by the end of this gen (not counting PC), if only because 360 and PS3 will continue to share so many multiplatform titles.
Hmm, interesting to see such domination from PC, the dying platform. Well, a good thing I game on both PC and consoles and even better that I prefer PC.
I know, right? Every single generation I read articles about how "PC gaming is dying" but it never does.
That list doesn't even show popular web-based MMO's, which are rising quickly.
Skeeuk said:
these aggregated scores are stupid, i cnt belive some ppl judge a game according to metacritic. a good example is fable 2, it was 92 according to 52 reviews, then aggregated to 89 from 70+ reviews? does the game all of a sudden become less worthy at 70+ reviews aggregated compared to 52+ reviews aggregated. its just a joke
|
The only reason they're included is to remove Wii's shovelware, which people don't think counts as exclusive.
I can post a list of exclusives without ratings, if you prefer, but there won't be much change in the platform leaders.
GO GO PC!
Tag(thx fkusumot) - "Yet again I completely fail to see your point..."
HD vs Wii, PC vs HD: http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=93374
Why Regenerating Health is a crap game mechanic: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3986420
gamrReview's broken review scores: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4170835
