Starcraft's post which you quoted and said "+4" mentioned dominance, so I thought you agreed with him in that respect. If not, then disregard.

I'm sure that Fable will at least equal the sales of its predecessor, but other than that, I don't see it being anything special.

"Dominance" is not referring to sales dominance, here, it is referring to it "owning" the holiday season in the sense that, hey, it will offer the most fun and varied experience so you can brag that your console is better than the others.

Never forget where the roots of the console war are, guys: system quality, not system sales.

So basically the only reasonable ones are:

1. Gears 2 and;

2. Price Cut

You'd like to have these ones on the XBLA, right? come on! admit it!

By the way, Ratchet is 15$ and Wipeout is 20$

You should add Burnout Paradise to the list, which is also definitely worth it.

nice spin/trolling/damagecontrol sonyboys

Id LOVE to have Siren...but thats besides the point. I can buy games like this in stores. XBL Arcade type of games stopped being made around the time ps2 came out...

PSN needs more games like Mortal Kombat 2...but I think Sony believes those games are not going to impress the general sony ps3 fanbase or something.

There is no chance of Microsoft selling 30 million by the end of the year, due to one indisputable fact: Microsoft cannot sell a console that has not been built. Getting to 30 million by the end of this year would require Microsoft to either make some 2.3 million units a month -which they simply can't do- or to have stockpiled at least 5 million units over the course of the year and make 1 million units per month on top of their current sales: exceedingly unlikely.

All three consoles will sell out this year. They virtually always do; even the unpopular ones manage. This makes the question of who can sell the most a simple question of who can build the most, and that is no question at all: Nintendo will dominate.

You're right... I bought Mortal Kombat 2, and it's definitely my worst buy on the PSN... I played it like 3 times and removed it from my hard drive.

I guess that's why the PSN appeals more to me and why XBLA appeals to you. I have really good memories playing games like MK2 or streets of rage, but I'm not interested on playing them anymore. Even less on my PS3.

To me, revival is only fun if you play it on the same system and with the same tv/computer...
I want to play street fighter 2 on a SNES, and soul calibur on a dreamcast and duke nukem 3D on my old pentium 133. It's part of the experience.

What I want from PSN is to bring me new fun games.

@Bokal

Yeah that makes sense...

we've all played some of those games to death. But adding achievements and online play where there was no online play before breathes new life in to old titles.

MK2...thats all I played when I had a ps3...online ofcourse.

Oh my god, open your eyes, its like if i said "the xbla is better because it has Banjoo n&b, Forza 2, Fable 2, DoA 4, Dead rising, (if those games could be downloaded on xbl) or the originals Halo, Fablle, Jade empire, ninja gaiden, psyconauts" and dont tell me than you wouldnt like to have those games on psn? But the xbla isnt there for that kind of games, is there for games like geometry wars, braid, castle crashers, pacman, galaga, doom, duke nukem, ikaruga and not just new games than can be downloaded from that channel.

Xbla is a whole experience different on psn with all of those games. You just cant compare those games on psn with the xbla games.