Well, I was afraid he would roast the PS3, but he didn't. Don't take it so personally. He just said that Live was a little bit different than PSN, and that it had a slight advantage. I think that's true at least until home hits. Between game voice chat, for instance. However, Live does cost money. We don't know anything about the structure of these services, so he's probably more knowledgable than we are on the subject. No need to flame him. He's said a lot worse stuff about the PS3 in the past that you can flame him about much more significantly.

Darn--I was JUST about to post that!  But even if we restrict it to systems that had it worldwide, the SNES had a service that let you play select online games, including Street Fighter 2.  There were friends lists and everything!

It even technically had a downloadable game--that online mmo-lite Zelda thing where they actually had people hired to broadcast the voices EVERY HOUR!

dreamcasts online was setup by ms, and was the first in america

Molyneux's comment was about as circumstancial as Alex Evans when he stated that LBP couldn't be possible on the 360.

While it is true that 'as is' neither game can be implimented on the the alternate HD system, the steparounds are so obvious and simple that it should take little more than common sense for either developers to impliment.

Minor lipservice on a technical truth. As expected from an exclusive developer and certainly not worth censur.

GOGOGO PETER! BESTEST DESIGNER EVAH!

LONG LIVE BULLFROG!

@Mibuokami: I think the problem with LBP was not the same as it wasn't a technical problem but a legal problem as user couldn't be able to post their levels to the Live.

Crap. I want a new Syndicate game now.

Thanks.

lol

@Bokal, I wasn't aware of that, sorry kinda neophyte on how Live function, Alan did mention that user generated content can be done on the Xbox in his interview though...

Ah Theme Park and Theme Hospital, now those were the days.

Flamethrower FTW! Or, alternatively, the mind-control gadget.