umm?

It was originally published by microsoft and funded by them why would they let it go to ps3??

Holy sh*t! Gamereactor gave the game 5/10!
...
WhoTF is Gamereactor? Lol.

http://www.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fgamereactor.dk%2Fanmeldelser%2F70794%2FInfinite%2BUndiscovery%2F&hl=da&ie=UTF-8&sl=da&tl=en

That's bullshit. What held back its potential is the fact that the budget isn't big enough. GTAIV is massive and fits on one dvd.

Thank you Godot. It seems we have a fanboy on our hands. 

OT: The game obviously has some issues that most reviewers agree upon. That being said, I personally don't see this as being a terrible game. Some people will definitely like it, others won't. Worth a rental in my opinion.

They gave Tales of Destiny like a 4/10 and aid that it should have never left Japan.

When I read that I knew Gamespot had no taste.

Um...  no.  Square-Enix is the publisher, and owns the material 100%.  They can do whatever the heck they want with it, once any timed-exclusive agreements with MS expire.  Same thing with Tales of Vesperia, etc.  -- not owned/published by MS at all.

Here's a (pretty much exhaustive) list of MS published RPGs that will never see the PS3: Mass Effect series, Lost Odyssey, Blue Dragon, Fable series, Too Human series. 

That's it.  No holds barred for any other RPGs, I'm afraid -- except timed ones, of course.

Of course, were I to list the Sony exclusive RPGs that will never see the 360, it'd be much shorter: Folklore.  That's it.  I can't think of another modern-era RPG Sony even owns the publishing rights to.

It's a joke guys. I guess my efforts to humor the PS3 crowd backfired on me. But thanks, I've never been called a PS3 fanboy before. n_n

omg is it that bad??

but

Castle Crashers Review 8.5

My apologies, then.

Edit: To the guy above me. 6.5 isn't 'that bad.' It's mediocre.

Um, actually 6.5 using most reviewers scales (including Gamespot) is pretty bad.  It doesn't necessarily indicate a bad game, but it is definitely a bad review score to get.