I actually agree with this, it's deliberately provocative and insulting. It's a defensive mechanism used to support the argument that the PS3 is actually winning, in an alternate reality where "real gamers" are all that matter.

Please stop using terminology like this, Diomedes. I'm a professional PC Gamer: you don't see me making fun of your more casual PS3 games, do you? Your games are for people who just play to screw around -- PC games are for professionals. THOSE are the real gamers, in my opinion.

Or, we can agree that we're all gamers, and that your preferences are not more "real" than mine. Is that fair Diomedes? I'd appreciate a response.

We don't even know what RE5's graphics are, all we have seen is a pre-rendered video made before development of the game started. And if you're gong to say its going to be on the Ps3 and 360 then you have to say its going to be on the Wii since the last time anything was said about what console it would be on Capcom said they would like to put it on all three (again before production began). I realize my dreams for a Wii version are somewhat futile, but I can always hope on a situation like RE4 for the PS2 and with Capcom's recent comitment to focus the majority of its development on the Wii and DS, one can always dream. I hate it when a series is on one console then moves to another, it's just frustrating, at least when RE came to Nintendo it re-established the whole series on Nintendo instead of just putting the sequel or prequel on it.

RE4 has been out on the Wii for one week in the US and a two in Japan, how exactly does that measure its sales?

Wow Blue3, with that kind of argument you'd make a great PR spokesman for Sony. Haha.