Wow, were's ioi when you need em? isnt he the guy that created this feature?

Wow, were's ioi when you need em? isnt he the guy that created this feature?

| DKII said: It's the weekend, give the guy a break. :P |
Yeah, geez. ioi runs a great site and one thing goes wrong and almost everyone starts flipping out!
Take a freakin chill pill. Nobody's perfect.
The whole internet is Nintendo Bias, from my experience on IGN and Gamefaqs everything always swings towards Nintendo.
A similarity of this is:
Tony Hawk is more popular offline world wide, but if you had an online poll asking skaters who do you like better, Tony Hawk or Rodney Mullen?
Rodney Mullen would win easy.
Reason for this, most skaters know Rodney is better at skating over-all, but the media and world as a whole would disagree, Rodney is still known as the underdog, but a skater knows better.
The majority of hardcore gamers know Nintendo has more desired games, however the world outside would swing to Sony.
Your average Joe PS2 owner isn't gonig to go on the internet to visit a games sites.

I just hope that ioi knows what Katillian was talking about and fixes that. It's important because it's another thing that damages this sites reputation. In a time when VGChartz is incredibly under apreciated, something like this only fuels the fire. If you can't fix it now please just take it down or place something else up there that lets people know that it's under maintenence.
to be totally be correct...i dont pay know attention to the game section because i feel its not complete..when i come on VGChartz i just check out the sales and look into the forums and if anything catches my attention i talk my opinon about it...ioi really needs to fix the game database section..i know this beta now but that surely needs some work done to it....^_^
| lolita said: I find it weird that Games have now 99 scores and also, how come it's all Nintendo? Sorry but even though I'm falling more into the Nintendo Fangirl category, I would give FFX a 10 anyday, Star Ocean 3 a 9... They're all games on PS2, from Sony a company that I don't like, but the games are great on it! That's what I call unbiased. We should all vote like that. Who cares if a game it's on X console, if it's great, it deserves a high note... Remember we're voting for the games, not the consoles! |
Lol, those are indeed good games but let's not forget there was gaming well before the sixth generation too.
End of 2007 Predictions:
Wii =18m
360=14m
PS3=7m
DS=64m
PSP=30m
^^ you weren´t online for a day and yet you live to tell the story... wow you are a brave man, whats it like to go cold turky ??? any hot or cold flashes, bugs under your skinn ??? JK but seriously it´s really funny to see this site go into chaos even if you just leave for a day, shows how much we need you, bet it´s a good feeling to be needed that much, when I saw all those playstation games in the charts I though hus returned and had you replaced with a evil clone, ceep up the good work :)

| ioi said: Fixed No more bad voting, only users registered with the site can vote and you can only vote between 1 and 10 (not any arbitrary number as people were managing to hack and do before). I have removed all the bad votes so should be all working ok now. I've also added a more sophisticated system for measuring votes and removing "bad" votes. I've decided not to reset anything because we only have 2-3 weeks of voting anyway so in another few weeks any bad voting should have been removed and I feel that with the votes I've taken out we are back to a pretty good and balanced situation now anyway. Sorry about that, I haven't been online for over a day so didn't realise this had been happening. ioi |
dude you should reset it, the damage has already been done, most people have already voted in this website so dont expect it to change much. You should reses it there arent mcuh if any fanboys in this place any how.

| ioi said: What are you going on about? Most of the 'bad' votes have now been removed so we are left with fair ones so no need to reset... |
My question is what are the bad votes? Just the ones greater than 10 and less than 1? Or did you find a way to see which votes were made multiple times by a single person? Either way I could still see it ending up around reasonable enough numbers. Thanks for the effort ioi.