By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - FFIV reviews: What is this bullcrap

i think RPG fan reviewed it when it released in japan,they might of gotten the import



tag:"reviews only matter for the real hardcore gamer"

Around the Network
whacker41 said:
ZenfoldorVGI said:
Kasz216 said:
It is weird. I mean the battle system isn't anymore archaec then 5-10 really.

 

Yeah man, this review is very strange, and some questions need to be answered, like how he reviewed the game on 05/21/08, or why he gave the story a 78, or the graphics a 70, when gamespot says it has the best graphics on the ds.

 

Well, in the review it says that 'The characters looked cleaner and more mature back on the SNES. The blocky, disproportioned, childlike models do not suit the game's mature story'. So i suppose that could have taken down the score for both story and graphics.

Don't get me wrong, I disagree with the statement. The graphics are some of the best the DS has to over, and certainly not Childlike.

The graphics are some of the best on the DS.  What is wrong with the story that made him give it only a 78.

 



Riachu said:
Suspense304 said:
12 RPG's better than FFIV I will try let's see... (this is for fun and joke purposes but with actual good games just to see)

FFVII or FFVIII or FFIX (Only one of those though, just take your pick)

Chrono Trigger

Pick a Tales of game

Secret of The Stars (Made by Tecmo, always loved that game, I liked it about as much as FFIV I think)

Suikoden I or II

Legend of Legaia

Star Ocean (pick one)

I liked Wild Arms 3 also....

Phantasy Star IV

.... damn, it's really hard to put 12 RPG's above or level with the original FFIV.. I'm actually considering getting a DS for this lol.

Secret of the Star wasn't that great from what I heard.  I also heard LoL and WA3 were mediocre at best

 

Secret of the Stars was mediocre. I'd know, I wrote a magic FAQ for it (the spells have no descriptions in the game). Definitely not better than FFIV.

I wouldn't reallyargue with the other games on that list (save for that FF8 trash).

 

 



Tag - "No trolling on my watch!"

I feel like I know more about games then editors on website and in magazines most of the time.



I would cite regulation, but I know you will simply ignore it.

Riachu said:
whacker41 said:
ZenfoldorVGI said:
Kasz216 said:
It is weird. I mean the battle system isn't anymore archaec then 5-10 really.

 

Yeah man, this review is very strange, and some questions need to be answered, like how he reviewed the game on 05/21/08, or why he gave the story a 78, or the graphics a 70, when gamespot says it has the best graphics on the ds.

 

Well, in the review it says that 'The characters looked cleaner and more mature back on the SNES. The blocky, disproportioned, childlike models do not suit the game's mature story'. So i suppose that could have taken down the score for both story and graphics.

Don't get me wrong, I disagree with the statement. The graphics are some of the best the DS has to over, and certainly not Childlike.

The graphics are some of the best on the DS. What is wrong with the story that made him give it only a 78.

 

 

The reviewer called the graphics 'childlike'. Perhaps made it hard for the reviewer to take seriously?



PSN- williwod

Remember, there are no stupid questions. Just stupid people- Mr Garrison

Around the Network

More importantly is the game out already or if it isn't when is it coming out?



Prepare for termination! It is the only logical thing to do, for I am only loyal to Megatron.

"No real complaints here. The game plays like the original; there aren't any camera issues or awkward configurations. You can use the stylus to move your character around and there are some added minigames that make use of it. That's all I have to say about that."

This lone paragraph here discredits his entire review. Reviewers are supposed to go into detail concerning the game's control mechanics in full detail, especially if its a remake where the control changes are the most important thing along with the graphical update.

The sad part is, this loser's review will negatively impact a couple people who planned on buying it based off his review and the Gamerankings (no matter how important you think it is) rating gets lowered more than it deserves.

Games usually have 1 or 2 bad reviews, but this guy has no basis for his review.



Leatherhat on July 6th, 2012 3pm. Vita sales:"3 mil for COD 2 mil for AC. Maybe more. "  thehusbo on July 6th, 2012 5pm. Vita sales:"5 mil for COD 2.2 mil for AC."

Suspense304 said:
12 RPG's better than FFIV I will try let's see... (this is for fun and joke purposes but with actual good games just to see)

FFVII or FFVIII or FFIX (Only one of those though, just take your pick)

Chrono Trigger

Pick a Tales of game

Secret of The Stars (Made by Tecmo, always loved that game, I liked it about as much as FFIV I think)

Suikoden I or II

Legend of Legaia

Star Ocean (pick one)

I liked Wild Arms 3 also....

Phantasy Star IV

.... damn, it's really hard to put 12 RPG's above or level with the original FFIV.. I'm actually considering getting a DS for this lol.

12 better 4th generation RPGs.  SNES era.



you should read MS Defense Force 1up review then.. not that their reviews are reliable in any way, but I like to see how many paragraphs the review has.. and the FFIV one is ridiculous



the words above were backed by NUCLEAR WEAPONS!

yeah reading it he just seems like an anti FF guy. They certainly exist. Just because most of the FFVII haters think that their favorite FF is so much better doesn't mean someone can't hate it. Think about it someone who just plain hated FFVII (or atleast claim to) even when it was out. They would give this same type of score.

It's obvious he played the Japanese version and simply disagrees with you guys. Sorry but it happens, get used to it.



...