FFIV reviews: What is this bullcrap

[whacker41]

Riachu said:

whacker41 said:

ZenfoldorVGI said:

Kasz216 said:
It is weird. I mean the battle system isn't anymore archaec then 5-10 really.

 

Yeah man, this review is very strange, and some questions need to be answered, like how he reviewed the game on 05/21/08, or why he gave the story a 78, or the graphics a 70, when gamespot says it has the best graphics on the ds.

 

Well, in the review it says that 'The characters looked cleaner and more mature back on the SNES. The blocky, disproportioned, childlike models do not suit the game's mature story'. So i suppose that could have taken down the score for both story and graphics.

Don't get me wrong, I disagree with the statement. The graphics are some of the best the DS has to over, and certainly not Childlike.

The graphics are some of the best on the DS. What is wrong with the story that made him give it only a 78.

 

 

The reviewer called the graphics 'childlike'. Perhaps made it hard for the reviewer to take seriously?