NiKKoM said:
You cant see the gun.. so no fps.. FPS is a sub genre of shooters just like Light gun shooters and on rail shooter.. the term came to define a more specific type of game with a first-person view, where the main character's gun and part of his/her hand is shown, almost always centered around the act of aiming and shooting hand-held weapons, usually with limited ammunition. The focus is generally on the aiming of one's own guns and the avoidance of enemy attacks, but the player is given more control over their movement than in on-rails shooters and most light gun games.he term came to define a more specific type of game with a first-person view, where the main character's gun and part of his/her hand is shown, almost always centered around the act of aiming and shooting hand-held weapons, usually with limited ammunition. The focus is generally on the aiming of one's own guns and the avoidance of enemy attacks, but the player is given more control over their movement than in on-rails shooters and most light gun games.
|
Once again I said maybe our stereotypes are wrong. I understand what the common thought of what an FPS is again. It's about there being movement of the main character and a gun showing. We all understand the stereotype.
I'm simply saying just because there is a stereotype doesn't mean you can't talk technically which is what I've been saying this entire time. I've included technically almost everytime. Is a light gun shooter in first person perspective? yea moreso than the stereotypical genre of FPS. Is it a shooter? once again yes. Tehcnically light gun shooters are FPS. That's all I've ever said and it's all been technical.
So I'll repeat it again, technically Duck Hunt is the best selling FPS ever.
















