Actually Sora, Riku and the like belong to Disney as they were considered "on contract" to Disney when created.

You can look it up, the only things SE own are the Final Fantasy Characters.

Soriku probably has the link somewhere.  He's put it up a couple times.

The Nintendo universe is better.
KH3 with Disney and Nintendo characters is a perfect fit.
SE can suck it.

Wellllll. You can't use the Wii is a more family friendly system arguement because you didn't see KH on gamecube... Though it's larger install base is of course a valid arguement. 

But bear in mind you have not seen a single screenshot for this game so you know it's not comming out untill at least 2010. By that time a lot of people are going to be looking for a bluray player for the HDTV they just picked up on sale at Costco, they'll be looking twoards the PS3 which will be around $200 at that point. Disney is going to be looking to pump money out of these people and sell them Aladin etc on bluray for little Jimmy. As icing on the cake they can also pick up Kingdom Hearts for Sally.  You don't think disney doesn't want bluray in as many peoples homes  as possible? We're talking about MILLONS of dollars here. Why make a big budget game on wii when they can make a low budget game on  Wii that will sell the same. 

So ask yourself a question: If you are disney which console do you wan't  to entice people to buy?

Why Kingdom Hearts III Might Go To The Wii:

In 2002 the Kingdom Hearts series launched. You know what people thought about it? That it was going to fail because of its casual apperance. Since the PS2 was a casual system, guess what happened. It went on to become a multi-million seller. This was since that people did not see it as a hardcore game. It was seen as casual because of its quirky characters and TV icons. The Wii has seen incredible success with the casual market. Putting Kingdom Hearts on the Wii would be a great move since most of the casual demograph would see Donald Duck and quirky characters and what casual would not buy that? If it went on to the PS3, the people who would buy it would be its die hard fans, a significantly smaller market than the casual buyers.

If it goes to the Wii, it will have monstorous sales. This is pretty much a no-brainer. Since the Wii has the casual fanbase that Square Enix is looking for, you can pretty much guarantee that the game will sell millions. The Wii is expected to outsell the PS2, and the PS3 will be lucky to pass the NES. With a console upwards of a hundred million, it would be insane not to release it. It also does not make sense to go multi-platform. At the absolute earliest, Kingdom Hearts III will release in 2010, and by then the Wii will be ahead of the PS3 and 360 combined. Multiplatform means they would have to use the two completely different engines of the Wii and PS3 and make Kingdom Hearts 3 out of scratch for both of them. Not only could this potentially make the game release later, it could also cost a lot of money and they might not see all of it back.

And I hear some people saying that if it goes to the Wii, the gameplay and graphics and story would suffer. I toss this away as ignorant bullcrap. The Wii is much, much more powerful than the PS2. And the PS2 was not even the most powerful console to release Kingdom Hearts for. If graphics truly mattered, they would release it for the Xbox. And Kingdom Hearts does not rely on realism, it relies on art style. I'm sure the Wii could pull nice art style for Kingdom Hearts. And some say Kingdom Hearts is cutscene heavy and can not work for the Wii. Once again, the Wii is more powerful and can handle the cutscenes for Kingdom Hearts and make them twice as nice as Kingdom Hearts II. And for the gameplay. If it is released for the Wii, I do not think that Square Enix would make the WiiMote for the Keyblade as the only choice. They could offer many different control schemes for it, such as the one I just mentioned, mapping the commands to the different buttons/movements on the WiiMote, and using the command menu.

Final Word: The Wii is the most logical choice for Kingdom Hearts III.

Quote from the infamous Wada interview.

"The Wii is the antithesis of the Xbox 360. It's strictly for hardcore gamers. The attachment rate for the Xbox 360 is much higher than for the Wii. People who buy the 360 really like games... I think the current trend is that most people aren't buying the Wii as a game machine, but as a toy... It seems that Sony isn't sure what it wants to do. Is it making high-end electronics or a game console for gamers? I want them to clearly define their console."

And the next thing you know, they have four titles coming out for the Xbox 360, 3 for PS3 and two so far for the Wii. So tell me, where do you think that next KH or remake FF7 coming out to.

Honestly, I stated before that KH and the Wii are a match made in family fun heaven, so something from the KH series will come to the Wii. Just don't get upset if its a bit more family friendly than it was in the best, if that was possible.
And unless if they "simplify" it, I don't think a remake of FF7 would hit the Wii. Maybe an DQ swords or something like that but not like the tech demo saw for the PS3.

Gamecube was the mainstream system last generation? I never said anything about being family-friendly, I was just talking about mass appeal. =P I believe the PS2 easily had that last generation, like the Wii does this one.

You could be right about the Blu-Ray, but I have no idea what goes on at Disney, and what the head honchos are planning. We'll just have to wait and see!

If I was Disney, right now I'd rather put the game on the Wii. In a few years?...I have no idea. I don't see how the PS3 is going to magically take off (or Blu-Ray for that matter). How do we know downloadable content isn't going to reign supreme? Sure it's not practical for everyone, but I'd bet most of the tech savvy have a nice internet connection. Do the masses care about the picture quality difference that Blu-Ray offers compared to DVD, when you consider the price difference? We'll see.

One question, does Disney's gaming division overlap with their other media divisions? The more they overlap the more I could see Disney wanting to promote Blu-Ray, but I'm not so certain that it's a priority for their gaming division.

Got a link?

And did you know its possible to run through walls? Its actually scientific fact that anything is possible so this thread is pointless haha.

P.S it really is possible to run through a wall look it up and then go try it

The numbers in that thread don't really support your argument.  Most of the numbers being thrown around in that thread imply that ps3 games will cost 2-3x as much as a Wii game, aside form a few exceptions like Killzone 2.  Of course, they listed exceptions for the Nintendo side as well.  mrstickball mentioned Super Mario 64 (64, not Galaxy) costing $15 million, though I'm not sure how true that is.  I'm sure SMG cost loads as well.

Some last gen games were highly expensive.  FFXII cost $35 million, and I really doubt that FFXIII is going to cost 4x that, or $140 million, especially with Killzone 2, one of the most expensive games this gen (if not THE most expensive game this gen), only topping $40 million (though I'm sure it's closer to $50 million now).  Hell, even $100 million seems to high for FXIII.  Halo 3 only cost $60 million, and half of that went towards the biggest marketing campaign in the history of media entertainment.

That part made me lol.