|_emmiwinks on 30 June 2008
BenKenobi88 said:
I don't know why you guys expected anything higher than a 7. My personal score was 5 or lower from the day it was announced.
I knew it'd be identical to GHIII except all about Aerosmith...which is stupid. I like some of their songs, definitely not a majority though, and plenty agree. It was just a stupid decision on Activision's part...there's no point in making an entire game based around one band...by including a huge variety the game will always sell more and be more enjoyable...they're just gonna chug out as many "different" GH games as they can, and people aren't going to like it for much longer. |
qft.
I thought it would get 6-6.5 at best since GHIII was only mediocre at best, and this is just that but based around a single band. I fully expect Guitar Hero: Metallica to get the same reviews. The artist wont save the game from being bad. Truthfully, I expect World Tour to top out at high 7s and low 8s. Activision just kills IP's they get, with Call of Duty basically being the lone exception (when made by Infinity Ward)
I own all three current consoles and a great gaming rig, now thats out of the way.
This space Reserved for the Nuggets of Wisdom dropped by Bladeforce:
"Why post something like this when all it will get is PS3 owners blinded to reality replying? BOTH THE PS3 AND BLUE-RAY WILL NOT LAST 3 YEARS! TECHNOLOGY CHANGED TOO FAST!"
"is it Wii FIt that has sold as many as PS3's sold? Thats a LOL Look at the total sales of software is it just me that sees Nintendo titles hitting 10m+ and you say they arent making a difference? Another LOL!"
"Hell, with all the negative hype Sony spin, people just aren't interested cost is too high and to get the true HD experience (1080p, 7.1 surround) you will need a $1000+ system. THAT IS GOING TO DO IT IN A RECESSION! PS4 will not happen"
