BRAP!!!!
+1 to sony
this game is a halo/crysis killer confirmed
| obieslut said: this game is a halo/crysis killer confirmed |
Don't start with this shit again.
From a guy that has the EGM mag with KZ2 as the cover story:
The games will be entirely different, and Geurrilla aren't aiming to "kill" anything.
awesome!!!
"i luuuv me some heavenly swooord" LOL I laughed. What I got out of that podcast is:
Guy 1: Killzone 2 looks REALLY good, like I'm not a graphics whore but it looks really really good.
Guy 2: Yea but there's nothing new, blah blah blah when u do this blah blah happens...Ive seen it already
Guy 1: Yea but there are things that I havent seen, like when u destroy a building and the particles fall down and the debris and blah blah blah (graphics)... it looks REALLY pretty.
I wouldn't think that that was positive killzone 2 talk, just more of the same that they said in their impression not too long ago. I think that this game is gonna be good, maybe not a 'reinventing the wheel' kinda of game (seriously y is it that ppl feel that EVERY game, to be good/great, has to be so unique and do soo many new things?), but a game that does things right and is fun.
It is a shame that this game will never see the light of day on PC, my thumbs just don't work right to play fps' on consoles.
makingmusic476 said:
Don't start with this shit again. From a guy that has the EGM mag with KZ2 as the cover story: Shane goes into explaining what happened with the first game in terms of hype, sales and story. The closing paragraph he reiterates on how Killzone 2 needs to be judged by it's own merits. Guerrilla hopes that gamers AND the media move beyond the "Halo Killer" title and see the game for what it is.
The games will be entirely different, and Geurrilla aren't aiming to "kill" anything. |
I'm glad Guerilla are above making claims that their game is better than any other available. If you make a quality product then that will speak for and sell itself. Besides, there is room in the market for more than one successful franchise.
| SnakeEyez said: "i luuuv me some heavenly swooord" LOL I laughed. What I got out of that podcast is: |
That is positive, imo. Most Killzone 2 detractors say that the first one was crap (and it wasn't really crap, by any means), so therefore the second will be crap.
This clearly says that the game is turning out great. It just doesn't really break the mold. It's going to be a great shooter wrapped up in a really pretty package.
And as far as "generic" shooters go, this looks to be the top of the heap, as it's combining the positives from all the other big FPSes out there.
Look what this nextgen.biz article has to say about the game:
[...]
Indeed, Killzone 2’s feature list is a checklist of modern shooter stalwarts. The cover system is called ‘lean and peek’, a capability apparently taken from Killzone: Liberation, Guerrilla’s isometric tactical action title in the series for PSP. L1 snaps the player to cover, with the chance to line up shots by peeking before popping up to take them. Strangely, there’s no blindfire option.
A buddy help system à la Army Of Two allows allies to boost the player to otherwise inaccessible places, with wonderfully animated sequences as the player-character pulls his way up, remaining in firstperson throughout. Though they can’t be ordered around, allies can be revived if they fall in battle, with the player accompanied by a squad for most of the game. Context-based chatter from allies and enemies is taken straight from Halo. “So players can understand the context in which the action is going on,” explains Ter Heide. “If you’re standing next to a barrel you’ll hear the Helghast say, ‘Shoot that barrel’, and you know it’s a good idea to move away.”
Shooting from Call of Duty 4 (though really the shooting hails back to the original Killzone, aside from the new iron sights mode), a buddy system like Army of Two's (in the original Killzone you were also part of a squad, but your mates weren't exactly the most helpful of chaps), enemy chatter akin to Halo (though the context base chatter was also in Killzone, to a degree), what game has combined stuff like this from other shooters into one package? One BEAUTIFUL package? PLUS it has the first person cover system, which the guys on the 1UP podcast really seemed to like.
De85 said:
I'm glad Guerilla are above making claims that their game is better than any other available. If you make a quality product then that will speak for and sell itself. Besides, there is room in the market for more than one successful franchise. |
That's all they wanted with the first. I think the "Halo Killer" title may have impacted the scores of the first somewhat. I think it deserved upper 7s, tbh.
The offline multiplayer with bots was very fun. I wish more games would include bots. Me and a friend facing off against a bunch of bots was awesome.
If guy #2 really says there is nothing new and he isn't impressed he needs to stop reviewing games. If new=good in his mind he would be marking down 99% of games made for an unjust reason. I would rather have a game that has perfected everything that other games have done before it than a game that goes so far out on the branch with new things that it is very close to breaking off and falling into the crap below. Though they can be refreshing, they usually try so many new things that they can't make them all reach the ambition they were striving for and ends up being spotty and mediocre.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2024 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
