Ok... I read what Tyler B had to say... I think he's the guy on the right.

haha berenstain bears!

EDIT:  But yeah...honestly, I would have taken this guy more seriously if he didn't say stuff like " If Nintendo has its way, young males will no longer be the dominant segment of the console audience" and be serious about it.

I mean, stifling a groan when a grandmother buys Cooking Mama?  Get over yourself, asshole.  Maybe the grandma wants to play because it is simple...there will still be games for teenage boys.

I think he lost some credibility with the including Viva Pinata in games that the Xbox360 had and the Wii wouldn't I mean come on that game easily fits on the Wii.

Well Viva Pinata as it is can't be on the Wii...graphically reduced sure.

The vivid colors and smoothness of it all sure is a plus. But I agree, if only Rare would run away from Microsoft...Nintendo could take care of it.

 Wow, I didn't even notice that quotation Ben. That's awful.

OMG! Nintendo doesn't want video games to be dominated by young men anymore. Evil!  

ssj12 you are way off base up there. If Nintendo made a motion sensing camera then would grandma be able to play? How many people are actually willing to kick to make something happen on screen. People are already complaining about the Wii mote, I wouldn't want it if they took the motion sensing that far. I can't kick worth a shit. Especially at the rate that games require of you. You would be exhausted after 1 level. I think there are some improvements that can be made to the current layout of the Wii mote but they have hit the nail pretty damn square in the head this time.

I smell a fan boy. Sorry, but it all felt like "SONY AWESOME".

I do beleive that the Wii Remote is a better dirrection then the EyeToy. The EyeToy limits you too a 2D plain. You don't have depth. The Wii Remote adds depth. Eyetoy is a step in the right dirrection, but how it was implemented was too gimikky. But, the SuxAxis isn't going to push the industry. It just pusheds it back. it uses the same technology as Kirby Tilt & Tumble. No real interaction. Oh, and Sony just added it so they could try and steal the hype of the Wii Remote. To bad it back fired.

But as you said in the first paragraph, there is no way to make something like that practiccal. How are you going to put it into people's house. Sure, it would be nice, but you're going to have to wait a while before you can actually play something like that. Items like the Eyetoy have yet to eenter the 3D realm and be practical. Till then you're stuck with the plastic wand.

Am i the only one who thinks NOT having a controller in your hand would make you look even stupider?

I mean, yeah it'd be neat to have a camera that could track your motions in real time. But could you move across the room and still play? Could you even have 4 players, or would you need 4 cameras? Maybe you just don't have friends over, and just play with yourself.

 1. if the camera has an auto zoom/focus yes.

2. easily, and no 1 camera

3. lol yea you dont have to have your friends over, connect to the through the PSN or Live and play against them.  

3, You could do that on Wii too...

 Other than that I must say that I feel a lot of hat from your side:

Well has it seems from DQ: Swords you will fight with you whole body and level up so nope sorry that isn't true. By they way what is the f***ing problem with puzzels at least I do enjoy that genre.

RPG: So far Wii has only one RPG coming and that is DQ: Swords, but the main question I have is why you shouldn't be able to make an RPG for Wii? The last one I played was Baten Kaitos and I could play that game with Wiimote plus nunchuk (sp?)

MMO: On a consol? And die because of Wii Play? Yes I think that Blizzard will give up the 8 million + paying members that plays WoW. Yes Blizzard will start making Wii Play clones from now.

Racing: You could controll it with the nunchuk, and so far I have heard many people actualy liked Excite Truck.

Sport: Will die? Ehh the name of the game for Wii is Wii Sport, and Yes I would rather play Wii boxing than a fight night on xbox360. Of course I would rather play Fight Night or a similar game on Wii than Wii boxing.

The next thing I must ask is why no fucking PS fan or xbox fan is bitching so much about, Buzz, Sims, Eye Toy games, Singstar or why not Guitarr Hero? The truth is that you are so afraid that you favorit consol will lose this gen, not because of the Wiimote might give more casual/miniparty games and less hardcore, but just that you will end up behind the company everybody said will become a 3rd party dev last gen. 

ssj12 is clearly a follower of that idea: casual games or accesories is good as long it is on the PS3. Motion sensors is good as long as it on the PS3. If something is on the Wii it is shit! Or why are you, ssj12, defending Eye Toy and the sixaxis when you seem to belive that the Wiimote and Nintendo is the big Satan? What is the difference? As a dev you could always chose to make a game with the classic controll, just as Nintendo is doing with SSMB:B or FE.

I must say that I personally love the idea behind Guitarr Hero, I can think that the Eye Toy could bring some fun games, buzz is really really fun on a pre-party or just a party. Just as the old boardgame TP is. Heck I can even understand Singstar because I then can share my hobby with others that don't understand why it is so fun to blow things up.

Here is an final sentence that you mayby should read more than once:

All games aren't made for YOU, just as not all clothes/music/movies are made for YOU!