By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - Secret Weapon for PS3 @ E3 Braveheart on Bluray!

no i am serious, my wife wont let me spend the money so it would take a complet sereis to do it, and that is Friends



 

Around the Network

All the Lord of The Rings Extended on one disk or the whole star wars double trilogy on one disk



Owner Of: PS1 PS2 PS3 PSP NES GB GBA GC WII XBOX

 

GodofWine said:
The Best of Jenna Jameson....

 

 Or Kay Parker for all of the classic lovers amongst us.



A movie pack-in would not help at all. Pack in an upcoming game, like RE5 or something.



Could I trouble you for some maple syrup to go with the plate of roffles you just served up?

Tag, courtesy of fkusumot: "Why do most of the PS3 fanboys have avatars that looks totally pissed?"
"Ok, girl's trapped in the elevator, and the power's off.  I swear, if a zombie comes around the next corner..."
kingofwale said:
makingmusic476 said:
tombi123 said:
Soriku said:
makingmusic476 said:
Lord of the Rings Extended Editions!

I'd die if those were announced. Of course, they would do absolutely nothing for sales.


Watching 6 hour long movies = DO NOT WANT.

 

All 'book to movie' movies should be about 6 hours long. LotR Extended Edition is much better than the normal LotR. If the Harry Potter movies were 6 hours long, they might have a chance at not sucking.

 

The first two HP movies did their jobs well. Why the shortest books are the longest movies of the series makes no sense to me.

Seriously, HP 4-7 are all almost twice as long as the each LotR novel, yet the movies are half as long. They left out SO much. Everyone I know who's seen the movies but hasn't read the books has no idea what the hell is going in any after 3.

 

Because Harry Potter books are terrible adaptation of JKR's books? We are talking about a bunch of C- actors directed by D+ directors.

 

Don't get me wrong, I love Harry Potter books, I would go as far as call myself a fan, but the movies themselves are just an embarrassment.

 

Are you really calling Alfonso Cuaron a "D+" director?

The guy directed the movie of the decade IMO.




Or check out my new webcomic: http://selfcentent.com/

Around the Network

Anyway, I would love to see LoTR come to Blu-ray. It's one of those series that would really benefit from HD resolutions. Jurassic Park would actually get me to buy my first Blu-ray if it released, too. I love that movie.

I would say Star Wars or Indiana Jones but that just ain't happening any time soon. Lucas is stubborn when it comes to adopting new video formats.




Or check out my new webcomic: http://selfcentent.com/

Soriku said:
makingmusic476 said:
Lord of the Rings Extended Editions!

I'd die if those were announced. Of course, they would do absolutely nothing for sales.


Watching 6 hour long movies = DO NOT WANT.

You forget we got through MGS4....6 hours is nothing for us...moehahahaha

 



All hail the KING, Andrespetmonkey

rocketpig said:
kingofwale said:
makingmusic476 said:
tombi123 said:
Soriku said:
makingmusic476 said:
Lord of the Rings Extended Editions!

I'd die if those were announced. Of course, they would do absolutely nothing for sales.


Watching 6 hour long movies = DO NOT WANT.

 

All 'book to movie' movies should be about 6 hours long. LotR Extended Edition is much better than the normal LotR. If the Harry Potter movies were 6 hours long, they might have a chance at not sucking.

 

The first two HP movies did their jobs well. Why the shortest books are the longest movies of the series makes no sense to me.

Seriously, HP 4-7 are all almost twice as long as the each LotR novel, yet the movies are half as long. They left out SO much. Everyone I know who's seen the movies but hasn't read the books has no idea what the hell is going in any after 3.

 

Because Harry Potter books are terrible adaptation of JKR's books? We are talking about a bunch of C- actors directed by D+ directors.

 

Don't get me wrong, I love Harry Potter books, I would go as far as call myself a fan, but the movies themselves are just an embarrassment.

 

Are you really calling Alfonso Cuaron a "D+" director?

The guy directed the movie of the decade IMO.

The Prisoner of Azkaban is easily my favorite of the HP films.



Alan Rickman is not a C- actor



PooperScooper said:
Alan Rickman is not a C- actor

Unless he plays one....