looks to me like you dont listen well then.

1up just gave a pretty negative impression for Killzone 2. But in general, I guess they try to stay positive.

 Well ok.  Not best game on the system.  But i haven't heard too many people say they thought it'd be a crappy game.  Outside a couple of people complaining it doesn't have much gore.

I know saying this will make people tell me to "get off the forum if you don't like it!", but I don't see how anyone believes that Killzone 2 will be anything more than if even an average shooter with good graphics, albeit with a very grayscale design that doesn't seem to take advantage of them. Guerrilla Studios has never made a game with an average review score in the 80s or higher, and it's clear from these previews that it's not IGN's reverse-conservative attitude, it's the developers. Mark my words, Resistance 2 will be the real next shooter for the PS3. Aside from Nintendo, Insomniac has excelled most in delivering great games of multiple genres for all age groups this generation.

Im getting this game for sure, thre is co op play so you can create a level with ur PSN buddies.

i would still buy this game even if ti scored a zero, and yes people i did say zero

ps3 will have many goty, games this year.

i expect LBP to get 10`s across the board, its fresh and unique and i cant think of anything thats similar on any console. surefied AAA game and a surefied multi million seller.

il certainly be getting this. no doubt ppl who dont like ps3 will moan and pick at it as usual, thier plans will fail.

I think we can all agree that GTAIV doesn't deserve to even be in the top 10 games of all time list. There were so many flaws I was starting to wonder if I'd gotten the right game. Now, before you call me a flamer, I'll concede that I was playing it on a very old TV and couldn't drool at the apparently marvelous production values. But the flaws, there were SO many of them, and not just small nit-picky ones, I'm talking about core gameplay mechanics. Where is the difficulty? Where is the driving AI? Where is the variety in missions? Where are the save points? But the worst part is the sluggish character movements, from getting tapped by a car moving at one mile an hour to the lousy cover system. None of these problems, however, compare to the absolutely laughable melee system. In melee mode, your maximum speed takes you about five seconds to approach a guy backing up, and if he has a gun, you can say your prayers. Even then, there's only a fifty percent chance that the melee attack will land. I know I'm getting way off topic here, but my point is that GTAIV's high high scores (which utterly disgust me) come from a huge amount of hype, and reviewers being afraid to give such a revered artifact anything other than a ten (this happened with Halo 3 as well, but that game had enough obvious flaws not to be significant). If a game is to be the highest-rated of all time, it must be virtually flawless AND well-hyped, as was the case with OOT. LBP, on the other hand, may or may not have at least one if not several flaws, and it's already clear that the media attention on LBP is crap compared to that of GTAIV. It won't diminish the greatness of LBP in any way, but the game isn't heralded as a piece of Martian rock, and thus, reviewers won't be afraid to find the little problems that show up in almost all games.

Knowing IGN lately, 10/10 confirmed. That's more of an insult to IGN than a huzza for LBP.