Because you still benefit from the motion controls, even though it's not the main way to fight. 

 OMG!!! I never stated it shouldn't be on the Wii. Stop twisting my words.

Read the discussion from the start. I will repeat for what is going to be the 4th and final time. I am completely content with a multiplatform release, just not a Wii exclusive.

I never knew I was an anti-Wii gamer. I guess I should sell it then.

You guys are all missing the actual point.
Soriku is going to be pissed tommorow when he has to read and reply to every single post in this thread. LOL

No, you stated it should be multiplatform because Wii doesn't sell third party software.

So by your logic your suggesting it should be multi-platform between a system that doesn't sell third party software and a platform that doesn't sell RPGS.

In which, the PS3's advantages can't be fully used.

The Wii's likely could be though, with motion controls working best for special moves. Though this implementation on the PS3 controller would likely not work too well on Sixaxis.

Your "content" with a multiplatform release because you want to play it on PS3. That's the only real logic I can see behind your reasoning.

There is no real reason it should be on PS3 unless the PS3 moves some heavy sales and some non Final Fantasy 13 RPGs sell.... or Final Fantasy Versus sells nearly as well as 13 proper. 

@MANUELF thanks

Well....this was fun guys....and was definitely not a rehash of the argument that has been made over and over and over again.

I seriously don't even know why people put these up for argument. We all know how the damn thing is going to play out. What's even more amazing is how far this argument is from being resolved. They haven't even started on KH3, everyone is talking about how long FFXIII vs. is going to take to come out, well that's also how long it will take for KH3 to start development.

It seriously pains me to think how many more times this same debate is going to be made before the platform is announced, and I, like an alzheimer's patient, will be drawn into them. Like a moth to the flame I just can't help my self.

Gah, it's 3 AM, and this post was pointless because it will stop nothing, but it just felt necessary to put all that into words.

Night all.

 I did not only state because it doesn't sell "non casual" 3rd party software" well, (nice how you changed it to just "3rd party software" though) but also because it has a large fanbase on the PS brand as well. That is my reasonings for a non Wii exclusive.

I haven't got a chance to read all 4 pages of this thread...but I've read through 2 pages and a lot of people are stating that this is a sony brand and will sell best on the PS3 and doesn't have the audience on Wii. If this game were to be Wii only and advertised well, not only would some current Wii owners buy it, but I'm willing to bet that those core gamers on the fence about the Wii would jump to it just for this game. Its easier for a game to increase a user base for a console that's only $250

 I own all 3 consoles so I will get to play it either way. I have always been a gamer who decided to not sit on fences and purchase each console for each generation, with the exception of the SNES. :( I was 12 though so I didn't have much of a choice then anyways.

As someone above me mentioned though this game is a long ways off considering the gap between KH1 and KH2 was 4 years.

4am here though and I seriously need some sleep. If someone wants to continue the off topic discussion please send a PM as I don't want to this thread to continue to derail.

Continually claiming that you have no problem with it coming to the Wii while viciously denying it using typical Wii detractor arguments sends two different messages. In other words you're not quite as content with it as you claim.

The worst part is that I could have plotted your arguments out with a graph before you even made them. Like I said, they're typical Wii detractor arguments. That should be a little worrying for you if you want to maintain your supposed unbias. You've basically jumped from predictable argument to predictable argument, even going to the "I just blame damn Nintendo!" argument with the advertising claim. It's absurd and yet I've heard it before: that Nintendo is at fault for not advertising other people's games. It's like Wii detractors have the same state of mind. I have yet to hear an original argument in this thread.

And the 3rd party argument was grand. You do realize that by having to explain away every massive 3rd party seller, you are hurting your own argument and validating the argument that 3rd party games do sell on the Wii, right? If they didn't sell, you wouldn't have to scramble for an argument to wish them away. The fact that you feel the need to explain them shows just how opposed you are to it. You can't accept that they're a success, there has to be something wrong with them. "NO! It's too casual!" "NO! It's too cheap!" "NO! It doesn't fit MY judgement of success!"

When will the excuses end? And what will you do if KH3 does go to the Wii? If would effectively destroy every piece of logic you've tried to propose in this thread, you would practically have to see the entire console wars in a new light.