@Euph,

I'm curious, I've rebutted several of your arguments now for example:

You say: "Larger user base not = higher sales."
I Say: "Actually yes a larger user base does equate to higher sales. A larger user base simply doesn't have a linear correlation with sales."

You Say: "Only thing I see is Kingdom Hearts large success on the Playstation brand."
I Say: "Anyways, your past history is based on the situation from the past, the situation has changed significantly...what part of that don't you get?"

You Say: "If your logic is right and mine is so flawed then Final Fantasy, Star Ocean, etc... wouldn't be on PS3 now would it? The reason they are still there is due to their success on the Playstation brand."
I Say: "In any case I can answer both despite the fact that I've made no attempt to claim either of them. First Final Fantasy XIII was in development well before anyone knew how successful Wii would be or how much the PS3 would struggle in the first year. And Star Ocean is developed by Tri-Ace not SE, its published by SE."

There are probably more examples, but you just keep moving to something new...so when do you stop moving to something new?

@Euphoria14
Name me three big budget third party games actually released on Wii.

 Better if Nintendo would advertise their 3rd party games more.

Sure it does. They just haven't sold.

Oblivion, Untold Legends,Folklore and Enchanted arms.

Also Valkria, whose bulk of sales should come from Japan... but a miracle could happen for that game over here.

What BIG third party wii game didn't sell well. Of the level that KH would be?

This is where your bias is screwing with your logic in my opinion. You are applying faulty logic to the wii without applying the same logic to the PS3. You are using small budget noncasual games, yet refuse to acknowledge the small budget RPGs on PS3... well those and a game considered one of the best WRPGS out there in oblivion. 

 Why should Nintendo Pay EA's advertising budget?

 Why doesn't nintendo buy them while they are at it.

It's not Nintendo's job to advertise other people's games.

On the contrary, Sony is spending so much time advertising other games (GTA) that they let their own rot (Folklore) and the 3rdparty gamesthat actually need it flop (Valkyria).

 What does budget have to do with it? SE isn't known for low budget games yet "The World Ends With You" isn't selling that great considering it is on a handheld with a 70+ million userbase.

RE4, Guitar Hero and soon to be Rock Band. Satisfied?

RE4 sold decent due to a $29.99 price tag and Guitar Hero III due to the fact that it is a casual game.

I would give more but this is not what this topic is about.

When you say good third party games don´t sell, any of them are big budgets games, all are low budged and with 200k  copies sold make profit.

Edit: all the games you mean(RE4, GH3 and Rockband) are ports.