By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - *Sony rubs hands greedily* the console increase was just the beginning....

Chrkeller said:
Blood_Tears said:

So are we renaming the thread to put Valves name in it after or is this just for hating on greedy Sony?

Until Valve charges for online I vote to keep Sony's as the headline.

Expensive hardware and paying for online...  that is some BS.

They do not need to. The steam machine will be just as expensive, but will be the weakest piece of shit going. Not charging for online changes nothing I am afraid.



Around the Network
Zkuq said:
160rmf said:

Cant see why. In a world reigned by capitalism, not everything is for everyone. That's why we have such category.

But that doesn't stop the less affortunates to have fun, like you are trying to imply.

Until the world that we live is completely ruined by war and the incesant resources mining, there will always be a lot of affordable ways to get entertainment. Specially the things that dont rely on tech complexity 

I'm just saying the luxury argument is a slippery slope, i.e. if you actually adhere to it, things will start to look very bad, because so many things in life are luxuries if you think about it. Fast internet access outside work? Mostly luxury. Books? Luxury. Sports equipment? Luxury. Meat? Luxury. Your favourite food? Probably luxury. Paper and pencils? Luxury (probably somewhat depending on where you live). Our lives are just full of different kinds of luxuries, and if all of it cost unreasonably much, you wouldn't be able to afford all that much Sure, there would still be affordable things left too, but overall, that sounds like fairly bland life to me.

There's probably ways to frame gaming differently from all the other luxuries, but simply excusing high costs for something because it's a luxury is a terrible argument.

Also, here are other things that certain members of the Epstein class have recently called “luxuries:” food, water, and breathable air. 



SanAndreasX said:
Zkuq said:

I'm just saying the luxury argument is a slippery slope, i.e. if you actually adhere to it, things will start to look very bad, because so many things in life are luxuries if you think about it. Fast internet access outside work? Mostly luxury. Books? Luxury. Sports equipment? Luxury. Meat? Luxury. Your favourite food? Probably luxury. Paper and pencils? Luxury (probably somewhat depending on where you live). Our lives are just full of different kinds of luxuries, and if all of it cost unreasonably much, you wouldn't be able to afford all that much Sure, there would still be affordable things left too, but overall, that sounds like fairly bland life to me.

There's probably ways to frame gaming differently from all the other luxuries, but simply excusing high costs for something because it's a luxury is a terrible argument.

Also, here are other things that certain members of the Epstein class have recently called “luxuries:” food, water, and breathable air. 

...Is that for real? I mean, it doesn't feel like it's that long ago that I wouldn't have even entertained the idea of someone seriously calling any of those luxuries, but the world has gone so crazy that now it actually feels like something someone might say.



Zkuq said:
SanAndreasX said:

Also, here are other things that certain members of the Epstein class have recently called “luxuries:” food, water, and breathable air. 

...Is that for real? I mean, it doesn't feel like it's that long ago that I wouldn't have even entertained the idea of someone seriously calling any of those luxuries, but the world has gone so crazy that now it actually feels like something someone might say.

You have the CEO of Nestle, who claimed that there was no right to water, in response to Nestle buying up aquifers in California. 

You have members of the Trump administration, including his agriculture secretary who are overwhelmingly members of the Epstein class, making absolutely tone deaf statements about the soaring prices of necessities. A small piece of chicken, a tortilla, and a pice of broccoli and whatnot. They used to demonize Klaus Schwab of the WEF because he supposedly wanted people to eat insects as protein. 



SanAndreasX said:
Zkuq said:

...Is that for real? I mean, it doesn't feel like it's that long ago that I wouldn't have even entertained the idea of someone seriously calling any of those luxuries, but the world has gone so crazy that now it actually feels like something someone might say.

You have the CEO of Nestle, who claimed that there was no right to water, in response to Nestle buying up aquifers in California. 

You have members of the Trump administration, including his agriculture secretary who are overwhelmingly members of the Epstein class, making absolutely tone deaf statements about the soaring prices of necessities. A small piece of chicken, a tortilla, and a pice of broccoli and whatnot. They used to demonize Klaus Schwab of the WEF because he supposedly wanted people to eat insects as protein. 

I've been jesting about following for a very long time, but now it doesn't seem to be so far fetched - it's time to put those old guillotines to work once again.



Around the Network
Random_Matt said:
Chrkeller said:

Until Valve charges for online I vote to keep Sony's as the headline.

Expensive hardware and paying for online...  that is some BS.

They do not need to. The steam machine will be just as expensive, but will be the weakest piece of shit going. Not charging for online changes nothing I am afraid.

That your prediction?  Ps5 is based on 2019 hardware, I will be surprised if the Steambox doesn't trump the ps5 with relative ease.  But we shall see.  I am going to laugh with the ps6 has $100 online fees.  



rtx 4090, 32 gb ram, i7-13700k

Switch 2

SanAndreasX said:
Zkuq said:

...Is that for real? I mean, it doesn't feel like it's that long ago that I wouldn't have even entertained the idea of someone seriously calling any of those luxuries, but the world has gone so crazy that now it actually feels like something someone might say.

You have the CEO of Nestle, who claimed that there was no right to water, in response to Nestle buying up aquifers in California. 
 

Waiting for the day that he goes to jail for any reason, and then would only get food, not water, since by his own admission, there's no right to it...



Bofferbrauer2 said:
SanAndreasX said:

You have the CEO of Nestle, who claimed that there was no right to water, in response to Nestle buying up aquifers in California. 
 

Waiting for the day that he goes to jail for any reason, and then would only get food, not water, since by his own admission, there's no right to it...

You will be looking like this before that happens



Ashadelo said:

We all heard about the new PS5 world wide price increase have we not???

United States
  • PS5 (Disc Edition): $649.99 (↑ $100)
  • PS5 Digital Edition: $599.99 (↑ $100)
  • PS5 Pro: $899.99 (↑ $150)
  • PlayStation Portal: $249.99 (↑ $50)
United Kingdom
  • PS5 (Disc Edition): £569.99 (↑ ~£90)
  • PS5 Digital Edition: £519.99 (↑ ~£90)
  • PS5 Pro: £789.99 (↑ ~£90)
  • PlayStation Portal: £219.99
Europe (Eurozone)
  • PS5 (Disc Edition): €649.99 (↑ €100)
  • PS5 Digital Edition: €599.99 (↑ €100)
  • PS5 Pro: €899.99 (↑ €100)
  • PlayStation Portal: €249.99
Japan
  • PS5 (Disc Edition): ¥97,980 (↑ ¥18,000)
  • PS5 Digital Edition: ¥89,980 (↑ ¥17,000)
  • PS5 Pro: ¥137,980 (↑ ¥18,000)
  • PlayStation Portal: ¥39,980

It's all because of ram and tariffs right?

*Sony laughs maniacally

*crickets*



Chrkeller said:
Random_Matt said:

They do not need to. The steam machine will be just as expensive, but will be the weakest piece of shit going. Not charging for online changes nothing I am afraid.

That your prediction?  Ps5 is based on 2019 hardware, I will be surprised if the Steambox doesn't trump the ps5 with relative ease.  But we shall see.  I am going to laugh with the ps6 has $100 online fees.  

Don't let all that surprise ruin the idea that you know what you are talking about, there's always next time, right?