Nobody is stopping you! Just saying... you seem to be the one in this forum who has the biggest problem with this and even fear that humanity will end but yet you seem to do nothing except for forum posts. I might be wrong but at least it sounds like that. 

And before you will say "I can't change anything on my own" like you said yesterday - there always has to be one who will start a change and even if the chance that you will be able to do it will be 1/1000000 it still should be you trying it if you really take this as serious as you say. 

Most organized protests and stuff like that even start in some forums or chats nowadays so that you can also do it like that but just posting here won't do that.

Because I need help, and I don't know how to get the strike going without it leading to chaos.

Full automation of labor would impose massive deflationary pressures and very large consumption discount rates, so the impact is overwhelmingly going to be concentrated in those whose income stems entirely from their labor.

Even a little in the way of savings or another form of income goes a long way here, though it's hard to predict much beyond that. Our current economic theories make zero sense when labor is fully decoupled from capital (or, rather, comes entirely from it).

I call it employers buying the hype and it ruining lives. Read again. It will do the shit it will do and mostly fade away. People of the future will wonder why we didn't put a stop to it. And the time frame is not necessarily short. Our lives are gonna be affected by this nonsense throughout.  But I don't buy the hype. The real danger is people being lazy trying to save money or make a quick buck, coming forcing this on employees and consumers and overfinancialization. 

And there is proof its rotting the brains of our youth. Studies have been done about this.

Mass layoffs only need to be a temporary issue. A world where all the work required to keep society running is being taken care of by AI systems and robots letting people do whatever they want with their time would make concepts like unemployment rate not matter any more. Governments are gonna need to be ready to handle the period between now and then though.

In general there are indeed future concerns like authoritarian regimes using the technology to crack down on dissent and entrench their rule but overall I very much expect the good to outweigh the bad since the good stuff that's already baked in is massive and that sort of world I mentioned is such a strong end goal that I really think something as disastrous as a Skynet sort of scenario would have to happen for the bad to outweigh the good long term.

Italicized: for self driving cars,  just use trains, buses and public trasnport. They are better, have been proven to be better for humans in general and are such a net benefit its not even funny. That will save many lives. For the old person care thing, i have a bridge to sell you. The real solution is not overworking people to the bone and having well funded human resources for the disabled and elderly. Its kot gonna be robots taking care of them, its gonna be humans. And for banning, it is possible if there is a will to do it. Its not as unrealistic as you think. You can ban gen AI slop and establishment of data centres, etc. There are a myriad of ways.

bolded: Increasing laziness of people as I said. Research has shown that Gen AI use is rotting the brains of so many people.

Regimes are already using AI for surveillance, propaganda, misinformation, and control, and it's only early days for the technology; looking at the state of the world today with the far right in ascendency across the Western world and authoritarianism thriving across the globe, do we really think politicians and billionaires are going to deploy this technology for the good of the masses, when they're already weaponising it against us?

There will be massive societal blow back to AI in the next 10 years, to the point where I think political leaders will even be elected running anti-AI campaigns.

That being all said likely AI will take over the rendering graphics pipeline for video games in the next 10 years as well anyway. I've been saying that for a while now here, DLSS5 is basically opening the pandora's box.

Ultimately I guess you cannot really be surprised, Nvidia hasn't been a "GPU company" for ages, they're a generative AI hardware company now. That's their main business, that was always going to spill over onto the consumer GPU side.

Video games are small potatoes in the bigger scope of things. 

I don't think Nintendo would be okay with just having their assets "drawn over" like all the pictures in this thread. At most they might make use of lighting and shadows being improved with AI, but they would say hell no to what this thread's examples are doing to characters and other assets. 

Nintendo also likes to recycle old assets to a hilarious level, so the longer they stay in the Wii U to Switch 1 level of graphics for their mainline games the faster it is for them to make. They are already about 13-15 years into making Switch 1 level assets. Switch 2 is mostly being used for higher resolution and other small additions. 

If it did happen though, I would just flat out stop buying Nintendo games.