By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony Discussion - Your top 3 most played games on PlayStation.

firebush03 said:

i have only played three Playstation games: TLoU:pt1 (~50hr), Astro Bot (~22hr), Astro's Playroom (~1.5-2hr). (The latter two were Platinum'd.)

How long have you had a PS5? Heck of an investment to play three games that have tallied under 100 hours. 

I've only had an Xbox One since April and have already put in over 150 hours on it. I'd put in more if I didn't have a Switch and PS5. 



Lifetime Sales Predictions 

Switch: 161 million (was 73 million, then 96 million, then 113 million, then 125 million, then 144 million, then 151 million, then 156 million)

PS5: 115 million (was 105 million) Xbox Series S/X: 48 million (was 60 million, then 67 million, then 57 million)

PS4: 120 mil (was 100 then 130 million, then 122 million) Xbox One: 51 mil (was 50 then 55 mil)

3DS: 75.5 mil (was 73, then 77 million)

"Let go your earthly tether, enter the void, empty and become wind." - Guru Laghima

Around the Network
Wman1996 said:
firebush03 said:

i have only played three Playstation games: TLoU:pt1 (~50hr), Astro Bot (~22hr), Astro's Playroom (~1.5-2hr). (The latter two were Platinum'd.)

How long have you had a PS5? Heck of an investment to play three games that have tallied under 100 hours. 

what’s it matter to you? I’ve got a lot of games in the backlog (GoW, SM, Horizon, FF, etc.), just don’t have enough time to play all of them.



Elden Ring 610h
Bamdyrs Gate 3 414h
Persona 5 Royak 261h (add more 103h of vanilla version if you please lol)



firebush03 said:
Wman1996 said:

How long have you had a PS5? Heck of an investment to play three games that have tallied under 100 hours. 

what’s it matter to you? I’ve got a lot of games in the backlog (GoW, SM, Horizon, FF, etc.), just don’t have enough time to play all of them.

Was you the guy was saying current gen games were boring and didn't take any risks or innovation? I've found a very strange take, but it makes sense if you didn't played anything substantial PS5 has to offer 



LegitHyperbole said:
OdinHades said:

The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth: 562
Call of Duty: WWII: 416
Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare: 211

I don't know exact numbers for PS3 titles, but I am very certain that I played GTA 4 and Skate 2 a whole lot more than both of those CoD games. I played much less in the PS4 times in general.

And I bet you haven't finished Binding of Issac fully. I own the game but it intimidates me, a game that has such simple controls being apparently that addictive can't be a good thing. 

Actually I got the platinum trophy and all trophies for Afterbirth and Afterbirth+, which includes unlocking everything. I didn't do that for Repentance, because Jacob & Esau suck ass and I don't want to play with them. I beat Mother and The Beast with every other character though.

And that's not all. I did the same thing on Switch with another 500 hours or something and I played Isaac for 141 hours on Steam. I didn't unlock everything on Steam though.

And yes, I'm absolutely addicted to the game and I can only recommend it, even if it is quite overwhelming at first. Not just because the ridiculous amount of content, but also the difficulty which just got harder with every update, lol.



Official member of VGC's Nintendo family, approved by the one and only RolStoppable. I feel honored.

Around the Network

1. is most likely GT7, last I checked it was at over 670 hours.
2. likely Puzzling Places, was at 173 hours.
3. Not sure, either RE8, CyubeVR or Horizon FW.

My most played game on PlayStation of all time is GT Sport, 3,937 hours logged driving time. (That's not counting making liveries, upgrading cars etc) A lot of that is from being stuck at home with a dislocated rib.

Minecraft is second most hours spend on all time on Playstation.

GT5 likely third.



IcaroRibeiro said:
firebush03 said:

what’s it matter to you? I’ve got a lot of games in the backlog (GoW, SM, Horizon, FF, etc.), just don’t have enough time to play all of them.

Was you the guy was saying current gen games were boring and didn't take any risks or innovation? I've found a very strange take, but it makes sense if you didn't played anything substantial PS5 has to offer 

never said they were boring, just that they lack risk and play far too safe. If Nintendo did SMOdyssey 2 as the mainline Mario for NSW2, for instance, I would be up in arms unless they really did a lot to change things up. (Though notice, I specifically mentioned launching on NSW2. No issue if it releases for NSW, with NSW2 getting its next-gen vrsn of Mario.)

GoW:R, HFB, and SM2 did not do a substantial amount different from GoW, HZD, and SM respectively, and it must be emphasized that yes, this is based entirely from what I have heard and seen from gameplay, the community, etc

I’m sure they’re all great games (I have purchased all of them for a reason), though I feel it shouldn’t be a bold assertion to claim that these franchises are not evolving in a satisfactory way from PS4 -> PS5. It’s like how many will judge NSMB series of games: I don’t believe one needs to play this series in order to see that they are very safe titles. So, to that, I offer the following question: Is it necessary to have played the game you’re talking abt in order to have *broad* beliefs in it? And let’s be clear: I’m not writing up scathing reviews on these first-party Sony experiences, I am simply critiquing them *for what they represent*, which is more-of-the-same, play-it-by-the-numbers. Yes, they are (rightfully) critically revered, and I’d imagine extremely fun to!…but they are also sequels which play it waaaay to similarly to their predecessor.

btw lots of Nintendo analogies here b/c, again, that’s where I’m most informed. Shouldn’t discredit what I say here.

(I feel like we’re getting off-topic here…PM?)

Last edited by firebush03 - on 25 October 2024

firebush03 said:
IcaroRibeiro said:

Was you the guy was saying current gen games were boring and didn't take any risks or innovation? I've found a very strange take, but it makes sense if you didn't played anything substantial PS5 has to offer 

never said they were boring, just that they lack risk and play far too safe. If Nintendo did SMOdyssey 2 as the mainline Mario for NSW2, for instance, I would be up in arms unless they really did a lot to change things up. (Though notice, I specifically mentioned launching on NSW2. No issue if it releases for NSW, with NSW2 getting its next-gen vrsn of Mario.)

GoW:R, HFB, and SM2 did not do a substantial amount different from GoW, HZD, and SM respectively, and it must be emphasized that yes, this is based entirely from what I have heard and seen from gameplay, the community, etc

I’m sure they’re all great games (I have purchased all of them for a reason), though I feel it shouldn’t be a bold assertion to claim that these franchises are not evolving in a satisfactory way from PS4 -> PS5. It’s like how many will judge NSMB series of games: I don’t believe one needs to play this series in order to see that they are very safe titles. So, to that, I offer the following question: Is it necessary to have played the game you’re talking abt in order to have *broad* beliefs in it? And let’s be clear: I’m not writing up scathing reviews on these first-party Sony experiences, I am simply critiquing them *for what they represent*, which is more-of-the-same, play-it-by-the-numbers. Yes, they are (rightfully) critically revered, and I’d imagine extremely fun to!…but they are also sequels which play it waaaay to similarly to their predecessor.

btw lots of Nintendo analogies here b/c, again, that’s where I’m most informed. Shouldn’t discredit what I say here.

(I feel like we’re getting off-topic here…PM?)

I probably misread your comment in the other thread then. Because I thought most about current gen games, not exactly Sony first party games. For example Baldurs Gate 3 is a very risky and deep game. FF 7 Rebirth also have a interesting and unique real-time strategy combat, its not everybody cup of tea but Square did a great job here, it feels close to the original but at the same time it's dynamic and modern (FF XVI though is a bit boring and repetitive button smashing with visual effects)

About Sony first party I agree, they are releasing incremental titles now. One of the reasons I still yet to play SM2 is because it looks too similar to original SM. Horizon FW is basically Zero Dawn refined (but its great you should give a try). There are some exceptions though. Returnal for instance is a very interesting take on Roguelike genre, it's not innovative but it's different from what Sony generally does



Call of Duty: Black Ops 4 - 1311 hours
Call of Duty: Black Ops 3 - 932 hours
Final Fantasy XV - 151 hours



PS5 is the only way to figure this out right?