Content removed.

Yeah, looking at some YT videos, 2050 laptops run modern games fairly decently, even without DLSS - so once DLSS kicks in, I have no doubt it will be able to run quite successfully most of the titles - if publishers choose so.

Not sure how this impacts potential Switch 2 performance. But Avowed, Dragon Age and now Snake Eater have been confirmed to not support 60 fps on the ps5 and series X. Rumor has it MH Wilds will follow suit, and 60 fps will not be an option for consoles. I wonder if these will just be outliers or if 60 fps is slowly dying this generation on consoles, now that games are really ramping up their graphics.

I said this before, and I'll say it again: I can see developers using DLSS not to find a way to get PS5/XS-tier graphics onto the Switch 2, but to take lower quality images and get them up to 720/1080p/occasionally 1440p while saving on storage space to continue to justify getting retail-level games on a cart.

That might sound like the opposite of sexy and exciting to most, but I'm good with that if it means that we can continue to get ports on the level of Witcher 3, Ace Combat, Subnautica, Dying Light, and Kingdoms of Amalur on a cart with the entire game intact, with the only required downloads being future patches/DLC that weren't purposefully passed onto the customer.

I'm not yet ready for an all-digital or mostly digital future, and if DLSS can be the means that Nintendo uses to justify keeping carts in boxes instead of codes, then bring it on.

Fair take.  I can't disagree with said proposition.  

I'm in the camp, most anything can be ported.  Just a matter of effort.  What sacrifices people are willing to take is personal preference.  

I’m really curious what he had to say. All his posts have been scrubbed across all three Nintendo forums he replied to…what could he have possibly said to warrant such extreme suppression lol.

He quoted some regulars who are typically civil and flamed them to hell and back, labeling them "Nintendo haters" for having the gall to approach the subjects at hand in a nuanced and rational fashion.

I doubt it. And I'm only basing that on the fact that it hasn't happened since the SNES. For some reason, even when they can port the biggest games to Nintendo's consoles, they don't. So I'm gonna take an I'll-believe-it-when-I-see-it approach with this one.

Doubtful.
Will Switch 2 (even if it has an enhanced dock this time) run on parity with Series X and PS5? Little chance.
Will more past and upcoming AAA games be functional on Switch 2 than Switch? Yeah, I would think so.
Switch 2 will probably be more powerful for its time relative to what Switch was in 2017, especially if the dock allows more enhancements this time.

Switch2 will never get as powerful as a standalone console. Power means heat. There are limits to how much heat you can take with having a battery in the same casing.

That being said with publishers wanting games on as many screens as possible, I think games will be developed in a way to run on Switch2, downscaled if needed. It's simply is a matter of wanting to make money.