By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics Discussion - 2024 US Presidential Election

Jumpin said:
RolStoppable said:

You underestimate how much coolness matters. It is what helped Trump win in 2016 nationwide.

I always thought it was because most of the US sees elections as a reality TV show, and that Trump deserves their vote because he's the most experienced.

The Apprentice was part of his coolness, yes. But that was ages ago and Trump hasn't done anything new since then. People need to see that their guy has still got it, but Trump has failed to do so.



Legend11 correctly predicted that GTA IV will outsell Super Smash Bros. Brawl. I was wrong.

Around the Network
zorg1000 said:

We are roughly two months away from Election Day, any predictions? I’m going with:

Harris-52%
Trump-46%

Harris wins all the states Biden did and picks up North Carolina. It’s not an Obama 2008 blowout but it’s bigger than 2012/2020.

That's where I'm at Harris wins it 319 to 219 winning PA,NC,GA,MI,WI,AZ,NV,NM along with all the standard blue states.  GA and NC will be a 1% or less win and will be recounted for months, but Harris will win them.



Jumpin said:
RolStoppable said:

You underestimate how much coolness matters. It is what helped Trump win in 2016 nationwide.

I always thought it was because most of the US sees elections as a reality TV show, and that Trump deserves their vote because he's the most experienced.

As I always say, my parents’ generation claimed video games and rock music would destroy the minds of my generation, only for the minds of my parents’ generation to be destroyed by “reality” TV and Fox News. 

Rupert Murdoch and Mark Burnett have a lid of horrific brain drain to answer for. 



Y'all are way too optimistic. I respect it, but I don't have that level of faith.



sundin13 said:

Y'all are way too optimistic. I respect it, but I don't have that level of faith.

I assume that your counter-point to the optimism is the long history of American stupidity. I admit, you win the argument if that's the case.

In the past few months I've been watching videos of CNN and MSNBC on YouTube every now and then. I suspect many people would say that MSNBC has a democratic lean if not bias, but I'd call it plain common sense. Channels like Fox News and Newsmax are obviously right wing pundits, so there's no point to bother. What surprised me about CNN, however, is that they are trying to play both sides. For one, they have that Republican guy on their panels who is against everything the Democratic party does by default. And two, there are times when they legitimate Trump campaign nonsense by treating it as if it isn't obvious bullshit.

So... the point is, if this is how TV in general shapes the minds of its American viewers, then I can absolutely understand why the Democrats still consider themselves the underdogs in this presidential race.

Going forward, what I expect is that Trump will do more of the flip-flopping he has done recently, most prominently on the topic of abortion. It's not that Harris will get more votes because of this, but rather that Trump's base can crumble a bit. There are a few issues that are very important for American voters and if they eventually cannot trust Trump anymore to stand for what they stand for, what reason do they have left to vote for him. Sticking it to the Dems? Yeah, you win that argument too.



Legend11 correctly predicted that GTA IV will outsell Super Smash Bros. Brawl. I was wrong.

Around the Network
RolStoppable said:
sundin13 said:

Y'all are way too optimistic. I respect it, but I don't have that level of faith.

I assume that your counter-point to the optimism is the long history of American stupidity. I admit, you win the argument if that's the case.

In the past few months I've been watching videos of CNN and MSNBC on YouTube every now and then. I suspect many people would say that MSNBC has a democratic lean if not bias, but I'd call it plain common sense. Channels like Fox News and Newsmax are obviously right wing pundits, so there's no point to bother. What surprised me about CNN, however, is that they are trying to play both sides. For one, they have that Republican guy on their panels who is against everything the Democratic party does by default. And two, there are times when they legitimate Trump campaign nonsense by treating it as if it isn't obvious bullshit.

So... the point is, if this is how TV in general shapes the minds of its American viewers, then I can absolutely understand why the Democrats still consider themselves the underdogs in this presidential race.

Going forward, what I expect is that Trump will do more of the flip-flopping he has done recently, most prominently on the topic of abortion. It's not that Harris will get more votes because of this, but rather that Trump's base can crumble a bit. There are a few issues that are very important for American voters and if they eventually cannot trust Trump anymore to stand for what they stand for, what reason do they have left to vote for him. Sticking it to the Dems? Yeah, you win that argument too.

I feel like Trump's base will just say "it's 4D chess" to excuse things like his flip-flopping. I think they trust Trump almost implicitly as a person, so they believe that he will do what they want regardless of what he says. They know that politics is a game and they see him playing the game. Even when he loses that is part of the plan. The fence sitters I don't think will really be won over by Trump's capitulations, so I do feel like it keeps focus on Trump's worst issues which is bad for him. I don't think it will really make a difference though.

My concern data wise is that the polling is incredibly close. While I don't really believe in the "Kamala honeymoon" theory, I do think that Trump has as much of an opportunity as she does to shape her political identity. She has thus far been winning that war, but it is concerning how close things were at the best times. A small polling error in the Republicans favor given today's polling could easily hand Trump the victory.

We'll see how things look after the debate. If she destroys him or gets destroyed I think we can see a real swing, but in all likelihood, each fanbase will insist that their candidate won and nothing will really change, leaving us with a coin toss in two months. 



Internal polling and other early indicators for Congress and the presidency supposedly have almost exactly the same race as in 2020, just 0.5 - 1 point bluer.



 

 

 

 

 

sundin13 said:
RolStoppable said:

I assume that your counter-point to the optimism is the long history of American stupidity. I admit, you win the argument if that's the case.

In the past few months I've been watching videos of CNN and MSNBC on YouTube every now and then. I suspect many people would say that MSNBC has a democratic lean if not bias, but I'd call it plain common sense. Channels like Fox News and Newsmax are obviously right wing pundits, so there's no point to bother. What surprised me about CNN, however, is that they are trying to play both sides. For one, they have that Republican guy on their panels who is against everything the Democratic party does by default. And two, there are times when they legitimate Trump campaign nonsense by treating it as if it isn't obvious bullshit.

So... the point is, if this is how TV in general shapes the minds of its American viewers, then I can absolutely understand why the Democrats still consider themselves the underdogs in this presidential race.

Going forward, what I expect is that Trump will do more of the flip-flopping he has done recently, most prominently on the topic of abortion. It's not that Harris will get more votes because of this, but rather that Trump's base can crumble a bit. There are a few issues that are very important for American voters and if they eventually cannot trust Trump anymore to stand for what they stand for, what reason do they have left to vote for him. Sticking it to the Dems? Yeah, you win that argument too.

I feel like Trump's base will just say "it's 4D chess" to excuse things like his flip-flopping. I think they trust Trump almost implicitly as a person, so they believe that he will do what they want regardless of what he says. They know that politics is a game and they see him playing the game. Even when he loses that is part of the plan. The fence sitters I don't think will really be won over by Trump's capitulations, so I do feel like it keeps focus on Trump's worst issues which is bad for him. I don't think it will really make a difference though.

My concern data wise is that the polling is incredibly close. While I don't really believe in the "Kamala honeymoon" theory, I do think that Trump has as much of an opportunity as she does to shape her political identity. She has thus far been winning that war, but it is concerning how close things were at the best times. A small polling error in the Republicans favor given today's polling could easily hand Trump the victory.

We'll see how things look after the debate. If she destroys him or gets destroyed I think we can see a real swing, but in all likelihood, each fanbase will insist that their candidate won and nothing will really change, leaving us with a coin toss in two months. 

The polling data is concerning. Their doesn't need to be a polling error even, all of the swing states are within the margin of error. 

Particularly in Wisconsin, the race is super close. For the past two presidential elections, Democrats were overestimated in WI. That doesn't mean it will necessarily be the same, but it is concerning. 

Pennsylvania is also pretty much a dead heat. Another state where Biden/Clinton were overestimated, and probably the most important state in the election. 

If she loses those states, then Harris will need some combination of Arizona, North Carolina, and Georgia. Either one or two of them. Currently, those are all coin flips.

So, yeah, I'm not crazy optimistic right now. If you look at what's happening outside the polls, one would think Kamala should win in a landslide, but obviously Trump voters see the world very differently, so I don't know how they'll respond.



Harris proposes a tax deduction of up to $50k for new small business owners: Kamala Harris to propose up to $50,000 tax deduction for new small businesses (msn.com)

Biden is trying (again) to bring student loan debt relief to millions: https://www.cnbc.com/2024/09/03/biden-may-start-forgiving-student-debt-next-month-.html

I'm not going to make the claim that Republican politicians aren't out there trying to do things to tangibly benefit the masses, but I don't ever hear about them. Someone is welcome to show me some proof.



JWeinCom said:
sundin13 said:

I feel like Trump's base will just say "it's 4D chess" to excuse things like his flip-flopping. I think they trust Trump almost implicitly as a person, so they believe that he will do what they want regardless of what he says. They know that politics is a game and they see him playing the game. Even when he loses that is part of the plan. The fence sitters I don't think will really be won over by Trump's capitulations, so I do feel like it keeps focus on Trump's worst issues which is bad for him. I don't think it will really make a difference though.

My concern data wise is that the polling is incredibly close. While I don't really believe in the "Kamala honeymoon" theory, I do think that Trump has as much of an opportunity as she does to shape her political identity. She has thus far been winning that war, but it is concerning how close things were at the best times. A small polling error in the Republicans favor given today's polling could easily hand Trump the victory.

We'll see how things look after the debate. If she destroys him or gets destroyed I think we can see a real swing, but in all likelihood, each fanbase will insist that their candidate won and nothing will really change, leaving us with a coin toss in two months. 

The polling data is concerning. Their doesn't need to be a polling error even, all of the swing states are within the margin of error. 

Particularly in Wisconsin, the race is super close. For the past two presidential elections, Democrats were overestimated in WI. That doesn't mean it will necessarily be the same, but it is concerning. 

Pennsylvania is also pretty much a dead heat. Another state where Biden/Clinton were overestimated, and probably the most important state in the election. 

If she loses those states, then Harris will need some combination of Arizona, North Carolina, and Georgia. Either one or two of them. Currently, those are all coin flips.

So, yeah, I'm not crazy optimistic right now. If you look at what's happening outside the polls, one would think Kamala should win in a landslide, but obviously Trump voters see the world very differently, so I don't know how they'll respond.

Agreed. It is hard to square the vibes with the fact that the race is tied and Kamala has no polling momentum. Part of me wants to reconcile that by just saying "Well, polls have underestimated Dems since Dobbs, so it's probably better for Kamala than it looks", but I don't know if I can even convince myself of that...

I've got my fingers crossed tight that the debate goes well, but if not, the next two months is going to be stressful.

As a side note, here is a link to volunteer opportunities: Volunteer | Kamala Harris for President

I've never done any of that stuff before but I'm seriously considering it.