Wrong. Nothing on 360 or PS3 is as large of scope and rock solid engine as Xenoblade X. It's a 150 square miles of map that is also vertical. YOu can chainlink both GTAV map and Skyrim and XBX is still over twice as large. Not to mention skyscraper-sized enemies everywhere.   You can fly in the mech insanely high and the game doesn't break. Xenoblade engines are insanely secure. You won't find a bunch of Jank like Bethesda. Runs as solid framerates, unlike Bethesda.

Besides sheer scale and seamlessness, the other thing that set Xenoblade Chronicles X aside from PS3/360 open world titles was performance.
Games like Skyrim, GTA5, Red Dead Redemption, etc had serious frame rate drops; XCX by contrast is rock solid and almost never dips during gameplay.

XCX was boring, put me to sleep.

XBX needs a remaster more than BB. Amazing game. Needs a sequel as well.

Red redemption was pretty solid on 360. Gtav yea it wasn't solid and obviously gtav is way more demanding and has a probably a 10x budget but making a living breathing city as detailed as it was on 7th gen was a miracle and only achievable cause of the massive budget they had. Xenoblade x looks alot like something  from the 6th gen with the super flat lighting and character models from 6th gen.

Which 6th gen games are you talking about?

Anyway, to me it's

X360 > XB1

PS3 < PS4

Wii > Wii U

DS < 3DS

PSP > PSVita

So it's the 7th gen for me.

Honestly it doesn't look much better then this if you compare videos running in the grass, and the character models are terrible by 7th gen standards. it has that 6th gen look but obviously on a massive scale cause of the hardware. 

Xenoblade X looks much better than the first Xenoblade on Wii

X's character models do look terrible, but again they're a massive improvement over the models of the first Xenoblade. They look ugly because of a bad art style.

Did you even play the two games?

Edit: Also, Xenoblade Chronicles is not a 6th gen game.

Obviously it looks much better then the wii version but it's just looks like it retains a lot of stuff you see from the 6th gen like the character models lack of detail, shadows and lighting, 2d grass galore  and very low poly environments, lacking shadows and lighting and just over all detail, it's hardly a impressive showcase imo, unless you focus on the one thing  it does good which is draw distance while flying but it suffers everything else, and also has a ton of pop in.

Xenoblade on Wii is using more RAM than any of the 6th gen consoles have. Zeldaring is wrong as usual. Not to mention Xenoblade X is a Wii U game.