Chrkeller said:
Seems to me the top states in homeless are all liberal.... and they are all expensive as crap. Just makes me wonder how successful these social programs are. I'm far from an expert, but one of the reasons I lean towards republican is because I wouldn't consider living in California, New York, DC, etc. Meanwhile I would happily live in NC, SC, etc. There does seem to be a correlation. edit I suppose my point is all these great programs don't seem to be resulting in great places to live. Perhaps we should wonder a bit more. I also live in Europe and it isn't what people think it is. Still a great place, don't get me wrong. But there are some major issues, like needing private insurance because national insurance has 6 month wait times. The grass isn't as green as many think it is. |
Seems to me the top states in poverty are all republican.... and they are all poor as crap. Just makes me wonder how successful these "small governments" are. I'm far from an expert, but one of the reasons I lean towards democrats is because I wouldn't consider living in Alabama, Kansas, Kentucky etc. Meanwhile I would happily live in Mass, Oregon, Hawaii, etc. There does seem to be a correlation.
edit
I suppose my point is that Blue states often tend to have successful economies which increase cost of living which unfortunately leaves some people behind. This could be considered a criticism of neoliberalism and the fairly conservative economic policies of the left in the late 20th century. Bill Clinton for example, ran on ending welfare as we have come to know it (and in many ways he succeeded). There is a lot of room on the left to address these concerns and improve conditions for those on the bottom, but to some degree, that requires sacrifice from those at the top which is always a tough ask.
On the other hand, Red states often tend to be pretty dang poor (and rely heavily on federal funding often provided by rich blue states). They also tend to avoid providing social assistance to those at the bottom. The combination of the two tends to drive costs down, but leaves a lot of people suffering at the bottom (or pretty dang close to it). Homelessness stays lower because housing is often so cheap, but that doesn't mean people in these states are thriving. And I really don't see much of a solution to these issues on the right. Cutting social programs more just tends to entrench poverty and no one really wants to even live in a lot of these places, so there isn't much to actually build an economy around without massive increases in funding (which would be a solution from the left).