By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Shtinamin_ said:

Has anyone heard about the FBI and the DHS partnering up to combat extremist gamers?

I did a quick search so let me know if I missed any info.

https://www.gao.gov/assets/870/865897.pdf

And this is what they declare makes you an extremist/terrorist.

Looking a bit more it looks like the U.S. Government Accountability Office has made a list of actions the FBI and DHS do that involves strategies and goals for sharing threat information with social media and gaming companies.

Should normal people need to worry that they get accidentally put on the FBI & DHS lists?

If you’re not a violent extremist than you probably don’t need to be worried about getting put on the violent extremist lists.



When the herd loses its way, the shepard must kill the bull that leads them astray.

Around the Network
zorg1000 said:
Shtinamin_ said:

Has anyone heard about the FBI and the DHS partnering up to combat extremist gamers?

I did a quick search so let me know if I missed any info.

https://www.gao.gov/assets/870/865897.pdf

And this is what they declare makes you an extremist/terrorist.

Looking a bit more it looks like the U.S. Government Accountability Office has made a list of actions the FBI and DHS do that involves strategies and goals for sharing threat information with social media and gaming companies.

Should normal people need to worry that they get accidentally put on the FBI & DHS lists?

If you’re not a violent extremist than you probably don’t need to be worried about getting put on the violent extremist lists.

Yes I agree as well. I guess this is more of a paranoia idea. In the other category it says “Such agendas combine personal grievances and beliefs with political concerns and aspects of conspiracy theories, as well as bias related to religion, gender, or sexual orientation.”

Correct me if I’m wrong but if someone gaming says that they believe a certain religion is trash, they would be put on their lists? And if that’s the case who decides what is allowed? And what is a terrorist remark? Is there a fine line or is it an arbitrary line?



Lifetime Sales Predictions 

Switch: 160 million (was 120 million, then 140 million, then 150 million)

PS5: 130 million (was 124 million)

Xbox Series X/S: 54 million (was 60 million, then 57 million)

"The way to accomplish great things, is to be indefatigable and never rest till the thing is accomplished." - Joseph Smith Jr.



Kevin rudd: Trump is a destructive president, traitor to the west, poor preparedness during COVID, trying to cling to power with the insurrection.
Australia calling it how it is. - Things that even Democrats haven't even been willing to state.

Trump: I don't know much about him, he isn't the brightest bulb, he is a little nasty.
Simple statements as expected from Donald, he doesn't like to use words.

Kevin Rudd is actually a very intellectual, educated individual with a very strong vocabulary... And also bi-lingual.
He started out as a farmer and was broke and worked his way up, that requires more brain-cells than being spoon fed from family.

Really hope Trump doesn't make his way to the top again.



--::{PC Gaming Master Race}::--

If you want a good chuckle, check out this review of Lady Ballers:

There sure are a lot of deeply broken people out there...



Shtinamin_ said:

https://www.gao.gov/assets/870/865897.pdf

And this is what they declare makes you an extremist/terrorist.

Hm, so let's see...

MAGA supporters would certainly fit in there.

Racially or ethically motivated: Considering the amount of white supremacists supporting the movement or the Pittsburgh synagogue shooting, a big

Anti-Government or anti-authority violent extremism: January 6 insurrection, anyone? Big fat

Animal rights or environmental violent extremism: wanting to destroy wind generators in favor of coal and petrol power: ✅

Abortion-related violent extremism: Wanting to make abortions illegal even in cases of rape or incest: ✅

All other domestic terrorist threats: Gun violence against minorities, like the Colorado Springs Nightclub shooting or trying to kidnap Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer: ✅



Around the Network
Bofferbrauer2 said:
Shtinamin_ said:

https://www.gao.gov/assets/870/865897.pdf

And this is what they declare makes you an extremist/terrorist.

Hm, so let's see...

MAGA supporters would certainly fit in there.

Racially or ethically motivated: Considering the amount of white supremacists supporting the movement or the Pittsburgh synagogue shooting, a big ✅

Anti-Government or anti-authority violent extremism: January 6 insurrection, anyone? Big fat ✅

Animal rights or environmental violent extremism: wanting to destroy wind generators in favor of coal and petrol power: ✅

Abortion-related violent extremism: Wanting to make abortions illegal even in cases of rape or incest: ✅

All other domestic terrorist threats: Gun violence against minorities, like the Colorado Springs Nightclub shooting or trying to kidnap Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer: ✅

So then wouldn't communists, theosists, oligarchists, democrats, republicans, dictator supporters, genocide supporters (and non-supporters), 1984, farmers, pro-choicers, battery supporters, those that gain in stocks, anyone that has conspiracy theories involving a branch of government, people who say there are more than two genders, people who say there are only two genders, peaceful protests, panderers, black only organizations (any color of skin), Catholics, Muslims, other Christians, Atheists, Hindus, Buddhists, Jews, etc be under investigation too?

Where is the line?

These plans for the FBI and DHS seem like this can lead to a disruption of the 1st Amendment.



Lifetime Sales Predictions 

Switch: 160 million (was 120 million, then 140 million, then 150 million)

PS5: 130 million (was 124 million)

Xbox Series X/S: 54 million (was 60 million, then 57 million)

"The way to accomplish great things, is to be indefatigable and never rest till the thing is accomplished." - Joseph Smith Jr.

LurkerJ said:

AIPAC Talking Points Revealed

MARCH 14, 2024

Documents show that the powerful lobby is spreading its influence on Capitol Hill by calling for unconditional military aid to Israel and hyping up threats from Iran.

This week, approximately 1,600 foot soldiers from the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) congregated inside the garish yet functional Gaylord National Resort and Convention Center, for the PAC’s annual policy conference.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addressed attendees by videocast, along with Israeli ambassador to the U.S. Michael Herzog. According to an incomplete speaker list, the entire Democratic and Republican leadership in Congress delivered remarks—Sens. Chuck Schumer and Mitch McConnell and Reps. Hakeem Jeffries and Mike Johnson. Sen. John Fetterman (D-PA) and Rep. Tim Burchett (R-TN) were both in attendance, among other representatives.

In past years, the conference has been a media spectacle, with a widely disseminated lineup of powerful speakers to showcase AIPAC’s enduring political influence. This year, however, it was locked down, with few social media posts and broadcast speeches, largely because of the threat of disruptions from anti-war protests. The goal of this year’s low-key gathering was to fire up attendees for AIPAC’s 2024 agenda, before sending them off to Capitol Hill to strong-arm Congress on supporting Israel.

The Prospect has obtained documents from the conference that preview the PAC’s lobbying blitz on Capitol Hill this week. The documents reveal AIPAC’s legislative strategy and the talking points it will use to support an unconditional $14 billion military funding package that has thus far been held up, among other policy changes. They also include numerous positions on aspects of the U.S. response to the war that have not previously been made public, from abolishing the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) to opposing recent restrictions imposed by the Biden administration on Israeli settlers. There is no mention of a two-state solution. 

THOUGH THE PRIMARY MOTIVATION FOR THE CONFERENCE was lobbying, the event also informed members about the PAC’s congressional spending plans. AIPAC has pledged to drop over $100 million on campaigns this election cycle to defeat any congressional candidates critical of Israel.

This week, the PAC touted its prowess to members as “dollar for dollar, the largest contributor to candidates in the 2022 midterm elections,” via its super PAC United Democracy Project. One brochure even pulls quotes from critical articles in The Intercept and Slate as testaments to its pre-eminence as an electoral juggernaut.

But the talking points promoted at the conference for its members to use on the Hill tell a different story. They’re exclusively directed at combating rhetoric and policy from Democrats, Squad members, cease-fire advocates, and even President Biden, who has only recently mildly criticized Netanyahu’s handling of the war.

Despite being a longtime donor and supporter of President Biden’s, AIPAC’s talking point also goes on the attack against him for recent remarks that, however tepidly, indicate a shift in tone. Biden has distanced himself from Netanyahu, embracing the language (if not the full meaning) of cease-fire, and more recently indicated a potential red line, should Israel launch a ground invasion of the Gaza border city of Rafah.

AIPAC dedicates an entire section of its file for members to rebuke the president’s comments, under the subhead “Why is President Biden dictating to Israel how to fight this war,” while simultaneously demanding military assistance from his government.

It advises members to say “concerns about the conduct of the war against Hamas are best delivered privately,” and “public statements that show divergence … are unhelpful and could embolden Hamas and Iran.”

you can read more here :https://prospect.org/world/2024-03-14-aipac-talking-points-revealed/

AIPAC and Netenyahu further aligning themselves with the republicans.

That's what you get for empowering a far-right leader. 



Absolute clowns, Lol.

Republicans: The border is a mess!!! Do something about it!!!

*Democrats give them something*

Republicans: Omg! Vote against it! We don't have anything to whine about in the elections!"

Last edited by Ryuu96 - on 22 March 2024

Bruh...Mike Johnson has blocked almost everything the Dems have put forward and now she's pushing a motion to vacate because he's passing a bill to avoid a government shutdown? She is insane, Lol. I hope the Democrats tell Johnson they will only save him if he allows the foreign aid bill to go to the floor immediately afterwards.

Last edited by Ryuu96 - on 22 March 2024

L.M.F.A.O.

Seriously, the Republicans can't govern.

Last edited by Ryuu96 - on 22 March 2024