Do we count the asylum speaking process as the proper procedure? It's at least correct legally. 

Specifically violent crime amongst illegal immigrants. 

"Commits a crime" is kind of a meaningless bar. Speeding and not wearing a seat belt are also crimes, and yet I doubt you'd hold those things against any US citizen.  

I view entering a country illegally as an entirely different category than not using a seatbelt or some other minor thing.

That being said I do think, and I've heard many Republicans say this, that the immigration process and citizenship path should be easier.  For her to propose that the border bill she had was some great compromise though is ridiculous.  It allowed tons of illegals per day.  That number needs to be 0 per day in any border deal or it's radical.

Yeah I get that. 

I don't particularly agree.

I think it's naive to expect that any system will be perfect, especially when you're covering ~2,000 miles of border.

Who exactly called it "some great compromise"?  

Oh also if someone is too uninformed to know Biden dropped out and is too lazy to vote unless it's mailed to their house, I'm glad we're not in 2020 anymore and I literally do NOT want that person voting. You gotta want to do it a little

Is it even legal to turn away every asylum seeker without going through the process to determine if their claim is legitimate? Even limiting it is on questionable ground to my knowledge. 

Sonia Sotomayor is getting a few calls to retire given that she's 70 but these calls seem way too late for me.
The Republicans blocked Barack Obama's pick for 10 months, they can easily do it for 2 months.
Donald Trump will probably get at least one pick in his second term. All the pre-Trump picks are seniors and at least one could retire or die in the next 4 years despite the fact that even the oldest of them is under 80.
Sotomayor is the only Democrat I see getting replaced statistically speaking given her age during Trump's term. Anyone else that retires would probably be one of the older Republicans.

all I have to say on the matter of immigration is that if you ain't a member of one of the indigenous tribes of the region then shut the fuck up about illegal immigration.

ESPECIALLY against the Mexican people, who probably have a greater historical claim to the land than any white person.

"History begins and ends where and when the white people came and went" Really does seem to be america's motto. No wonder it's such a racist nation on the whole.

That didn't take long...

Top Republican senator calls for ‘swift retaliation’ against ICC, chief prosecutor

Tom Cotton, from the US state of Arkansas, has issued a statement calling for action against the International Criminal Court (ICC) and its chief prosecutor for pursuing Israeli officials.

Cotton was a strong contender for Trump’s running mate, and the US president-elect’s team is now considering him for the cabinet role of defence secretary, according to Politico and Axios. The Senator, however, has turned down that offer, according to Axios.

In his statement, Cotton said the ICC “has no jurisdiction in Israel and its illegal pursuit of Israeli officials is built on a lie”. He added, “Any attempt by kangaroo court prosecutor Karim Khan to threaten the United States or our allies should be seen as an act of aggression and face swift retaliation.”

Khan asked for arrest warrants for Netanyahu, his Defence Minister Yoav Gallant and three Hamas leaders in May, saying there were reasonable grounds the men had committed war crimes and crimes against humanity.

The court has yet to decide on the warrants.

The court already established jurisdiction in 2021 based on the case against Israel for the 2014 Gaza war. But so far the US and UK have been successful at suppressing the arrest warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant.

It appears 'Rule of Law' is just a matter of convenience. Sadly not surprising.