rapsuperstar31 said:
I think you're both right and wrong there. Microsoft started it, buying up Halo which was being made for both Mac and Playstation 2. The Xbox 360 didn't have any problems competing with the PS3. The PS3 didn't have too many more games than the 360 2563 vs 2157 games. The 360 had a lot of full paid exclusivity and paid timed exclusivity deals on the first Bioshock, Mass Effect 1 and 2, Alan Wake, Dead or Alive 4/Extreme, Ace Combat 6, Blue Dragon, Crash Bandicoot Mind over Mutant (not on ps3), Dead Rising, Elder Scrolls IV, Last Remnant, Tales of Vesperia, Lost Odyssey, Lost Planet, Metro 2033, Need for Speed, Naruto, Ninja Blade, Ninja Gaiden 2, Phantasy Star Universe, Quake 4, Ridge Racer 6, Saints Row, Witcher 2, Beyond Good and Evil HD, Braid, and 100's of other ones of various degrees. Sony may be worse, but neither Sony nor Microsoft is innocent in the exclusivity deals. |
How can MS start it when Sony was making all kinds of 3rd party exclusive deal and buying studios during the ps1 and ps2 era? MS had to buy studios like Bungie and secure games like Halo to get into console gaming or else what's the point. MS got smoked during the 6th gen so they had make big 3rd party deals if they wanted to compete with PS3 in anyway. They couldn't go through another 6th gen situation or else they would have probably given up after the 7th gen.
I don't blame Sony for making moves to be the dominate player in console gaming, but MS has every right to push back and do what they can to be competitive as well.
Last edited by smroadkill15 - on 10 April 2023