By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics Discussion - Russia and Ukraine flashpoint

TonsofPuppies said:
EpicRandy said:

I don't want to derail this thread so I won't reply further than this post.

- There's a big difference between refusing to hear someone else speak (not listening) and refusing to allow that person to speak at all or refusing to allow other people (who willingly want to do so) listen to that person speak.
Nothing in my previous post says otherwise, not allowing someone on a stage does not equal not allowing them speak speak at all and also does not prevent anyone from listening to them they'll just have to do so through other medium and in the case of Shapiro believe me there are plenty... unfortunately. 

- If they've chosen to do so, antifa (or another other group of activists) have no right to shut down that speech.
That's were we disagree. They have all the right to voice their opposition or even protest the decision, that's is also called free speech or right to protest. If the college/ university reverse course due to the voiced opposition then there's nothing wrong with this.

- they do not own the stage, to use your wording.
They do not own the stage they own their voice which they used successfully to the extend that the campus reversed decision to allow Shapiro on stage. Free speech is what ultimately denied Shapiro the stage. 

We actually don't disagree here. If an activist group complains to the university and voices their opposition to a proposed speaker and THE UNIVERSITY chooses to cancel that speaker, then that is their decision. Not that I'd agree with that decision, of course, but in that instance, my criticism would be against the university for caving to student pressure rather than the activists themselves.

Having said that, what you (and I) just described is very different than the university choosing to host the speaker anyway (despite complaints from far-left activists) and then those activists using intimidation, suppression and/or threats of violence to shut down that speaker after they have been given a platform. If you agree with the use of this tactic, I find that quite disappointing and sad, though it wouldn't surprise me these days.

I don't agree with those tactics and I'm not aware of any being used in related case. If they were used than it's a matter of case by case as to wheter or not they are isolated incident or used in a widespread manner and individual should be dealt with case by case. If you want to blame Antifa, you would have to proove that the ultimate decision was taken because of those incidents and not because of the overwhelming opposition alone, and also that the individual were actualy Antifa member. For all that I know Antifa, and even though I don't deny their existence, is more of a name drop scaregoat used by the right to discredit any opposition more than anything else.

If you want to continue this discussion. Please do so in the us politics thread as I believe it is more appropriate for this and I read it often so I will reply there.



Around the Network

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/61001565

Seems Russia decided this part of the sporting ban was a lost cause.



TonsofPuppies said:
Barozi said:

Suppression and censorship are definitely not exclusive to fascism. Communism (Leninism specifically) as well as religious and military regimes say hi.

To quote the first line of Wikipedia: "Fascism (/ˈfæʃɪzÉ™m/) is a form of far-right, authoritarian ultranationalism"

Antifa is the opposite of far-right, they are the opposite of authoritarian and the opposite of nationalistic.

So yeah they might share a trait with Fascism (and the other types I mentioned above) but that doesn't make them fascist.

I didn't actually call them fascists, if you read my original post. I merely stated that they use methods which are fascistic in nature, which is ironic given their political stance. Regardless, it's not a good way to go about getting your message across and I can only look at those who support their methods as uneducated, ignorant or worse.

I know that you didn't but there's really nothing ironic about it when these methods are far from being exclusive to fascism.



SegaHeart said:
Ryuu96 said:

Warning: Very Graphic

This video is too much, I know I should not watch it. But those are innocent Ukrainian civilians, I actually want a Nato country or another Country to help? Is there anyway a Nato country can get involved without US getting involved trigger Russia not to you know? Use the unspeakable weapon. I think we should let a Nato Country fight, but set new rules that USA doesn't enter unless the Nato country gets nuked then USA enters? Have you guys ever seen a sad images in USA of 80+ year old grandma's with a bag and struggling with little she has but is enough she is happy? But watching a grandma walking struggling is sad you just don't want anything to harm her. Or a 80+ year old grandpa :(, I want a Nato country to get involved but not USA to get involved not yet.

It’s unlikely to be a single Nato country. It will either be all of Nato (well besides Hungary it would seem) or none of Nato.



Hungary is such a bad situation. The people are very conservative there, but their only choice was between a Putin ally conservative or a bloc of liberals who would enact policies the majority of Hungarians would have opposed. Do you vote for the side you disagree with 90% of the time, or vote for the side you agree with on most issues but is supporting a Hitler-like figure?

This is the problem with elections in general. People may have a candidate they agree with on almost everything, but there could be that one hot button issue they agree with the other side on, causing the other side to win. Then those elected do what their party wants for their term, taking little thought into some other minded people that put them in power in the first place.



Around the Network
Hiku said:

It's a state owned news agency, and they went into detail about how:
- The MAJORITY of the Ukranian polulation are nazi.
- All Ukranian's who take up arms (including civilians protecting their homes) MUST BE ELLIMINATED and are responsible for genocide of Russian people.
- That their nazism is far more dangerous to the world than Hitler's was.
- That denazification means de-Ukrainianisation.
- That ordinary Ukrainians MUST EXPERIENCE ALL THE HORRORS OF WAR and absorb the experience as a historical lesson and atonement for their guilt.

This is absolutely horrifying, and may explain why raped and murdered women had swastikas' carved into their bodies.
Russian state media is basically calling for and justifying genocide by dehumanizing the majority of the Ukranian population as nazis. They say that doing what they did in Crimea won't work this time. Ordinary Ukranian's must suffer all the horrors of war.

Ryuu96 said:

Warning: Very Graphic

Seeing this video and then reading the reason mentioned above made my stomach churn. Truly disgusting, Putin is comparing Ukraine with Nazi Germany while he himself is acting like a fusion of Adolf Hitler and Heinrich Himmler on steroids.

I'm sad. Sad about what happens to Ukrainians, but also about the Russian people who don't believe Putin's lies and are basically trapped in their own country.



Ryuu96 said:

Ukraine war: Sanctions on Russian oil and gas a 'red line' for Hungary, says Orban | Euronews

What a piece of shit Orban is, keep licking Putin's asshole.

E.U. proposes cutting funds to Hungary for rule-of-law breaches - The Washington Post

Do it.

I really don't get why Hungary are in the EU or Nato at this point. Joining the EU means signing up to its membership charter on things like human rights, judicial independence etc. Hungary breaks these rules, then complains when the EU sanctions it. I've seen brexiteers online cheering Hungary against the 'dictatorial; EU, appearing to miss the point as well.

And I get Ukraine isn't in Nato, but Hungary sitting on the sidelines whilst the rest of Nato is supporting Ukraine, and particularly saying they'll pay Putin in roubles for Russian gas seems like they've chosen to side with Putin.



SecondWar said:
Ryuu96 said:

Ukraine war: Sanctions on Russian oil and gas a 'red line' for Hungary, says Orban | Euronews

What a piece of shit Orban is, keep licking Putin's asshole.

E.U. proposes cutting funds to Hungary for rule-of-law breaches - The Washington Post

Do it.

I really don't get why Hungary are in the EU or Nato at this point. Joining the EU means signing up to its membership charter on things like human rights, judicial independence etc. Hungary breaks these rules, then complains when the EU sanctions it. I've seen brexiteers online cheering Hungary against the 'dictatorial; EU, appearing to miss the point as well.

And I get Ukraine isn't in Nato, but Hungary sitting on the sidelines whilst the rest of Nato is supporting Ukraine, and particularly saying they'll pay Putin in roubles for Russian gas seems like they've chosen to side with Putin.

I can't speak on the EU part, but as for NATO, while it originally started as a defense treaty mostly because of USSR/Russia, it is now days more about protecting ourselves from terrorists or China. It wasn't until Putin built troops up on the border that Russia was on our minds again. Hungary, I assume, wants to stay in NATO in case some terrorist (state backed or otherwise) attacks it, then they will have allies to fight back just like America did after 9/11.



Ka-pi96 said:
SecondWar said:

I really don't get why Hungary are in the EU or Nato at this point. Joining the EU means signing up to its membership charter on things like human rights, judicial independence etc. Hungary breaks these rules, then complains when the EU sanctions it. I've seen brexiteers online cheering Hungary against the 'dictatorial; EU, appearing to miss the point as well.

And I get Ukraine isn't in Nato, but Hungary sitting on the sidelines whilst the rest of Nato is supporting Ukraine, and particularly saying they'll pay Putin in roubles for Russian gas seems like they've chosen to side with Putin.

Being in the EU is profitable for them, it's as simple as that.

They should absolutely be kicked out though! They shouldn't get any of the benefits if they can't even respect basic EU principles like human rights.

The problem is that there's no legal way to expel a member state. They may leave if they wish so, like the UK did, but they can't be expelled.

However, what can be done is withholding payments to Hungary and stripping them of their voting rights, making them members of the Schengen area and not much more anymore. This could seriously hamper the Hungarian economy, but could also backfire as this could be considered overreach by the European Commission. Still, at this point, I'd consider this the right thing to do. Hungarian media and judiciary are de facto in the hands of Fidesz, which gives them a giant advantage in any and all elections, which is partly why they can get an absolute majority in elections, as the opposition is severely suppressed.



Ryuu96 said:

The Traitors*

Surprised Boebert isn't there but MTG is such a vile, disgusting woman, she is literally only in politics just to be a troll.

Gosar and Biggs once again supporting any shitty cause they can find just because.