Blood_Tears said:
Anytime a person begins a sentence with "The only reason the PS2 sold.." or "The only reason the PS2 has this record.." you know your about to get some Grade A bullshit excuse. 248 pages in the thread and still shoveling the same crap over and over again from the beginning of the thread. Who cares why it sold, it sold that amount and that's all that matters.
Do people discredit the X360 numbers because of Rrod and repurchases inflated the numbers? No they don't, they're accepted. It's only when certain people can't accept that their precious Switch didn't beat the PS2 number(yet) and have to think of constant excuses for their preffered plastic handheld. Some people need to have some eggnog, relax a bit and stop being so obsessive.
|
Or maybe people just look at the context and actual facts and form an opinion on that.
If the PS2 is really the "more popular" console, it shouldn't be a large amount behind the Switch after 8 years.
The only reason the Switch 1 may not hit 160+ is because Nintendo may possibly prematurely end its product cycle and not give it a traditional discounted late gen phase that most consoles get the benefit of (to the contrary they've actually increased the Switch 1's price). Everyone here knows it can top 160+ if it was given a proper chance at it.
So yeah, I call it as a I see it. If you have two sprinters and Sprinter A has beaten Sprinter B like the majority of times they raced head to head and then retired after a reasonably long career, I consider Sprinter A better than Sprinter B. Doesn't matter if Sprinter B didn't retire as soon and technically eeked out more races won over time.
For the record too, the DS could have crossed 160+ mill as well IMO, Nintendo simply prevented it from doing so. Had nothing to do with market conditions or demand.
Last edited by Soundwave - on 23 December 2025